Printable Version of Topic: Question
IronOak studios forums > General Discussion > Question
| Posted by: tinkerbell March 04, 2006 05:43 pm |
| Hey BB dudes do you think you can make grenades for the game. That would be wicked cool man. You throw a grenade and see the leftovers of the zombies everywhere. Just wondering if you can add that on your next update. |
| Posted by: SNIPER-X March 04, 2006 06:39 pm |
I'm sure we'll think about it. Without a doubt, if we add them. They wont be there to pick up constantly, as they are one special source for an escape  |
| Posted by: hunter March 04, 2006 07:29 pm |
| I dont think it will be accepted. It wasnt for the original bb. |
| Posted by: SNIPER-X March 04, 2006 07:59 pm | ||
Just because it wasn't in the Original, doesn't mean we will not make the Source edition have any new changes  |
| Posted by: Dirty-Shizno April 22, 2006 03:25 am |
| i love the old BB it was great but instead of the Gatling gun can you guys make it a SAW or an M240B that can be reload like the on in CSS that would be a lot bettter i think |
| Posted by: **[STARS]**BrasileiroSk8r April 22, 2006 06:04 am |
| i agree, i read a post somewhere about why some weapons were chosen and left out of BB because the makers wanted it to be realistic in what kinda weapons would be in a local suburban town, thus being why they didnt have nades. but having a minigun kinda pushed it a little far beyond that realism, so yah....SAW or m60 would be nice. |
| Posted by: SNIPER-X April 22, 2006 07:24 am |
| As far as adding additional Machine guns such as those mentioned. Have absolutely no intention, and probably won't be added. Due to a number of reasons... 1. Simply SAW's aren't for brainbread...this isn't world at war genre' 2. I don't feel like doing the animations, ect, for those. 3. We want to release BB for source sooner than later! |
| Posted by: Security Corporate April 22, 2006 08:38 am |
| Really, we should only get probably weapons. Having heavy machine guns or maybe even a grenade would be exaggerating. It should be more probable. |
| Posted by: Elite viking April 22, 2006 11:43 am |
Even if machine guns and other high powered weapons are unusual in a normal city, we're not talking about a normal city. This is a city at war. Humans vs zombies. I bet the army and swat and lots of other forces are sent in, and since a lot of those are dead we can take their guns  |
| Posted by: Jono April 22, 2006 11:56 am | ||
you can reload the minigun anyway, look on the right side of the gun, theirs a feed port that accepts clips, mainly low ammo rectangular clips from what i have seen but im sure you can get drum mags or a chain belt if there were nades, theyd have to be like they are in the specialists, because it wouldnt be fun just throwing grenades into the crowds over and over |
| Posted by: Hobo Ninja April 22, 2006 06:27 pm | ||
*Looks at name* RED VS BLUE ROCKS! |
| Posted by: hunter April 22, 2006 10:16 pm |
| Is the gas tank staying in? |
| Posted by: SNIPER-X April 22, 2006 10:24 pm | ||
In the real world we like to call it "Propane canister". Yes, it's still in. |
| Posted by: **[STARS]**BrasileiroSk8r April 23, 2006 03:50 am |
| well, you could just use the smae animation for the SAW with the one in CSS just with probably a different skin. but otheran that, i dont think it shuld be included neither shuld the chaingun, it just makes it too easy, along with grenades. if you put em in, make them like rare to find or requiring a lot of skill points, otherwise everyone just keeps getting them and fragging all the zombies that the whole area is practically free of zombies. its happened to me before in the slaywatch map, i was with like 12 or more ppl. |
| Posted by: SNIPER-X April 23, 2006 05:31 am |
| Everything in the original BB will be in Source. End of discussion on removal of objects, because it's going to work like this. Either we will add something in, or adjust it. Otherwise, removal is out of the question. |
| Posted by: Neiko April 23, 2006 05:35 am |
| Why not alcohol bottles with rags on fire? Those are home made and give out a weaker output than the nades, and too make up for a little damage, it has fire damage in a radius of exploding? |
| Posted by: MeMB April 23, 2006 02:15 pm |
| That's actually a very good idea IMO. Go Molotov Cocktails! |
| Posted by: Blue Summer April 23, 2006 03:19 pm |
| There isn't really much of an explosion with a petrol bomb, the only thing that would damage a zombie is th glass flying into it, but zombies can't feel pain so why would fire affect the dead skin. my two cents |
| Posted by: Nikku April 23, 2006 05:27 pm |
| zombies can burn, numnuts |
| Posted by: hunter April 23, 2006 06:01 pm |
| ROFL nikku! Yes zombies can burn so thats why the flamethrower kills them! |
| Posted by: Neiko April 23, 2006 07:19 pm |
| Oh, and just a zombie fact, they freeze faster, since their body temperature drops due to death. (hint hint, secret ice gun?) |
| Posted by: Snow! April 23, 2006 08:44 pm |
| Zombie's don't feel pain when burning, but essentially, their brain gets fried, and they die. |
| Posted by: Keyes April 23, 2006 09:30 pm |
| LIQUID NITROGEN! Get a super-soaker full of it! |
| Posted by: Hobo Ninja April 24, 2006 12:52 am | ||
Dude! Fire always owns zombies in the movies... why? Because when you catch on fire you burn! DUR! Sure they don't feel the pain but that doesnt stop the skin from melting off them... it should slowly kill the zombie. |
| Posted by: THE Phreak April 24, 2006 03:16 am |
| Fire kills just about everything. Freezing a zombie just slows down molecular motion, effectively putting a zombie out of commision, unless they unfreeze. |
| Posted by: Neiko April 24, 2006 03:33 am | ||
But we don't have to be 100% realistic do we? :] Why not make them internally combust one frozen? |
| Posted by: Snow! April 24, 2006 04:13 am | ||||
Haha, how paradoxic. |
| Posted by: Security Corporate April 24, 2006 06:42 am |
| Heres a new idea: Can zombies be killed by human diseases that attack the brain? Think hunting rifles loaded with Alzheimer darts!  |
| Posted by: Snow! April 24, 2006 06:50 am |
| Zombies are already braindead... or should i say, brainbread! So, diseases don't affect them |
| Posted by: Security Corporate April 24, 2006 07:58 am | ||
So you are saying if we shoot them in the head, then their brain is double dead? If thats the case, then the diseases will still work! |
| Posted by: THE Phreak April 24, 2006 09:09 am |
| Double..dead? |
| Posted by: Snow! April 24, 2006 09:44 am | ||||
I don't get you. Zombies are dead in the first place. How many times do you want it dead? |
| Posted by: hunter April 24, 2006 05:35 pm |
| You cant kill an allready dead mind! Hear have some anthrax! |
| Posted by: Joey2cool April 25, 2006 12:47 am |
I've always wondered what the term 'BrainBread' meant... is their brain a slice of white bread? |
| Posted by: Mic2070 April 25, 2006 08:50 am |
| Diseases won't affect them. Their brain is part dead, part alive. Only the essential functions (Eat) are kept alive. And, why the hell Alzheimer darts ? Just give it a good 'ol shotgun blast in the head damnit ! |
© Invision Power Services (http://www.invisionpower.com)
LiteBar skin by InvisionSkins.com - copyright 2003 Goof Muilwijk [Roadkill71]