Printable Version of Topic: Political Discussions

Click here to view this topic in its original format

IronOak studios forums > Offtopic / Freiwild > Political Discussions


Posted by: Security Corporate April 18, 2007 03:05 am

As to prevent certain topics from being derailed by members who are less bright than others, I'm making this thread dedicated to any dicussion/argument on politics. This can range from the effectiveness of people in power, a country's foreign/domestic policies, your position on certain wars and so on.

However, there are rules to this:

1) Make well thought out arguments.
2) Don't be an asswipe and call other's who don't have the same viewpoint "idiots" or "morons" or any other kind of insult. The point of these discussions are to learn different ways of thinking from others and to keep an open mind. If you can't do that, I suggest you get the fuck out. Right now.
3) Never let your discussion degenerate into a flame war.

If there are any violations of the rules stated above, your post will either be edited/deleted or you'll get warned by the moderators. Behave!

Now, I'll leave it to you guys to start the first argument.

Posted by: Lundquist April 18, 2007 09:45 am
and in a super human effort to re-rail, this already-2-post-derailment (tanker and gamerT1 im talking to you) Lets start off with a specific discussion and one that we all have a hand in, regardless of which side of the pond we are on.

The US occupation (im not in the mood for mincing words and an occupation is what it is, think Germany post 1945 only without the fucking wall) of Iraq, is it justified?
The now world famous lies about the presence of possible WMD's (weapons of mass destruction) what do you think of them and how they have become yesterdays news so quickly? (remember your government lied to you about why it was going to war with another country)
Should they have ever 'gone in' in the first place?
What position could america/britian have adopted instead of invasion?
Should they still be there now?
If you think they should leave how would you deal with the civil unrest that is likely to arise afterwards?

These questions may be a little biased as my own views on the matter are ever so slightly anti-establishment. However, i seek to spark discussion, so discuss!

Posted by: Security Corporate April 18, 2007 10:11 am

Well, the US occupation could have been more successful if the stragety used was different. The troops need to clear out the city block by block, building by building, and then drive the insurgents back and secure a much tighter line around the city. Although this sounds like a tedious and probably deadly strategy, it would have been way more effective than what's happening now.

If the Bush Administration really wanted to attack, they could at least have the decency to have a well thought out plan of attack. Right now, it's just quantity over quality. We wouldn't need all these thousands of soldiers over there if the strategy was more effective in the first place.

My two cents on the subject. cool.gif

Posted by: Tanker April 18, 2007 12:10 pm
... im sort of in the middle of this conversation... on the one hand yes i believe we should have gone in... for a large list of reasons... none of them have anything to do with WMDs... On the other hand i believe now the battle is pointless and we are just waisting our time and soldiers... though it would be extremely difficult to pull out at this point... it would set Iraq into a complete civil war which its already in but by pulling out of Iraq we would basically be doing what the europeans did to africa years ago... if we pull out and leave them with no strong government then they will end up fighting the same damn war for hundreds and hundreds of years with no end...

Posted by: mallic April 18, 2007 06:08 pm
I believe in war because it helps the economy I meen look at WW2 before the war we were in the depression and during the war all the men were sent out and that opened more jobs for women and made more jobs producing weapons which brought us out of the depression and made us be a super power

Could be handled better though. I mean whats with this crap of america being soft hearted about how we treat our priseners. I mean the enemy we are facing KILLS ITS OWN PEOPLE and tortures our troops to death whenever they catch one. Here we are being kind to the crazy fuckers. We are fighting an enemy that will kill itself to kill us, we can't afford some of the stupid laws involving combat that bush is sending out.

Posted by: Lundquist April 18, 2007 08:43 pm
QUOTE (Security Corporate @ April 18, 2007 10:11 am)
Well, the US occupation could have been more successful if the stragety used was different. The troops need to clear out the city block by block, building by building, and then drive the insurgents back and secure a much tighter line around the city. Although this sounds like a tedious and probably deadly strategy, it would have been way more effective than what's happening now.

If the Bush Administration really wanted to attack, they could at least have the decency to have a well thought out plan of attack. Right now, it's just quantity over quality. We wouldn't need all these thousands of soldiers over there if the strategy was more effective in the first place.

My two cents on the subject.  cool.gif

Cool, so intelligent discussion.

I can see your point SC but like, in a city the size of Bhagdad, with that many houses, that many streets, alleys whatever, how can you physically search every house, street by street, room by room. You either use the troops you've got, which might not be enough to do the job effectively (you risk missing people if you do it quickly, or do it carefully and take relatively forever) or you start drafting your own civs in (ala Vietnam) and you lot took offence to that last time your government tried it.

Quality over quantity...you're damn right on that one. The american battle plan has basically been the same since the civil war, which is to throw men and equipment at a problem until it goes away. Essentially its the same as any armies plan thorughout the history of the world, but the US has a decent economy and can pull it off.

I can't be bothered to read down atm, so whoever it was who said this kinda thing does the economy good, is right. Problem is that [some law of economics that i can't remember the name of] suggests that this is a cancerous style of growth, its self destructive. You can fight everyone forever and unfortunately even if you could, reasources are finite comodities, you've only got so much steel, energy, food, willpower, soon-to-be-corpses before you run out.

THink of it like a car, you're driving it flat out, then you hit the nitro, only instead of like a 2 second burst you leave the nitro on (assuming you've got a big ass tank of nitro) how long before your engine tears itself apart under the strain? *shrug*

Just look at what happened during that whole hurricane thing in New Orleans. All the home guard and everything were out in iraq, so there were no emergency responce teams set up. Coupled with this was the reaction of the citizens there, instead of trying to help each other out of this fucking god awful situation they found themselves in, they sat around blaming everyone else, stealing their shit, raping thier women and shooting at anything that looked like it was trying to help them out. Craziness.

I'm exagerating a little here to get my point across but unfortunately not any great extent. You people really need to get your government to prioritise what actualy important, not that we as British citizens have got anything to crow about. What we need to do is get like a million or so chavs in the center of london, get them drinking, then get them really angry about something, then just set them loose on the streets of London. That would give the government something to think about.

Posted by: Tanker April 18, 2007 08:49 pm


Mallic-unfortunetly america cant torture POWs... its part of our whole global peace crap... the best we can do is give them to other countries to torture... still i dont believe that torture doesnt exist in america... things happen behind closed doors... you know what i mean?

but you are right sometimes torture is just a necessary evil... and we are fighting a war where our enemy is a coward and uses cowardest tatics as a fighting style with no regaurd for any of the normal fighting guidelines... really they are cowards... they wear civilian clothes as camo... they blow themselves up... i mean really if blowing yourself up brings you so much honor and crap why doesnt Binladin do it? (cant spell his name but you know who i mean...)

Lundquist- i wouldnt say you got it exact Lundquist but your awfully damn close... I think the biggest problem in our government right now is Bush's overall stupidity... we arent fighting the war right... Yes us americans have a tendancy to just throw soldiers at a problem... but really what else are you going to do? thats war the more soldiers you have the stronger... we train them to be the best and then we put them out there... the problem is all Bush can think to do is keep putting more and more... I guess thats how his one track mind thinks... Its like if your trapped in the corner by a bear... so you pick up a rock and throw it at the bear... well that didnt work so you panic and keep throwing rocks with no real effect... thats what Bush is doing... he can't think of anything else to do so he just keeps throwing soldiers out there... and to be honest i dont think you (you being the British) would have faired much better against Hurricane Katrina... it was just one of those things that you cant make into a positive because it just gets worse...

Posted by: hunter April 18, 2007 09:08 pm
QUOTE (Lundquist @ April 18, 2007 07:43 pm)
I'm exagerating a little here to get my point across but unfortunately not any great extent. You people really need to get your government to prioritise what actualy important, not that we as British citizens have got anything to crow about. What we need to do is get like a million or so chavs in the center of london, get them drinking, then get them really angry about something, then just set them loose on the streets of London. That would give the government something to think about.

Now thats a real problem us brits have, all this anti social shit and this new scene of chavs. I mean ringing up the emergency services like fire engines just so they can lob shit at it! I mean what would actually drive you to do something so pointless and retarded! They are actually the scum of the earth and need dealing with, the government actually needs a massive holocaust. What we need to do is round all the chavs up in a field and destroy them.

Posted by: Vox_Bloodstone April 18, 2007 09:54 pm
QUOTE (hunter @ April 18, 2007 09:08 pm)
Now thats a real problem us brits have, all this anti social shit and this new scene of chavs. I mean ringing up the emergency services like fire engines just so they can lob shit at it! I mean what would actually drive you to do something so pointless and retarded! They are actually the scum of the earth and need dealing with, the government actually needs a massive holocaust. What we need to do is round all the chavs up in a field and destroy them.

The best way to deal with the chav infestation would be to put them all on a deserted island and then nuke it or just blow it up in some way, then we wouldn't have any more anti social behaviour

i had a chav come into my work thew other day and steal a litre of vodka an morgan spice and he ran out the shop before i could stop him, i rang my manager he told me not to bother phoning the police they don't come out unless you get hurt during the theift which shouldn't be the case at all

Posted by: mallic April 19, 2007 02:24 am
stay on topic damnit

and yea the war helping economy only helps so far but as far as katrina we actually had ALOT of forces here but our government was slow to deploy them despite the fact that they had the knowledge that kat was going to be bad

Posted by: Tanker April 19, 2007 12:24 pm
wars helping to stop depression only really works if your in a depression... now a days they do more damage than anything else...

Posted by: Security Corporate April 27, 2007 05:11 am

Furthering the discussion on aliens and immigrants here thanks to Zombie's suggestion. smile.gif

Tanker, I'm not going to drop it because you don't get it. You don't live in Arizona close to the border. When people here say immigrant, it means the person legally got to the country, while alien makes them seem more illegal. You stop trying to contradict me, especially when you don't live where I live, and experienced what I've experienced. Really, it is you who should be dropping it.

Posted by: mallic April 27, 2007 01:47 pm
that doth be true we do have a hella lot of aliens and not htat i have a problem with people coming over but they should do it legally and if they cant here is an idea: FIX YOUR OWN COUNTY AND STOP TAKING THE EASY WAY OUT BY COMING TO AMERICA

Posted by: Security Corporate April 27, 2007 02:41 pm
QUOTE (mallic @ April 27, 2007 05:47 am)
FIX YOUR OWN COUNTY AND STOP TAKING THE EASY WAY OUT BY COMING TO AMERICA


For many, that's easier said than done. sad.gif

Posted by: Tanker April 27, 2007 02:55 pm
QUOTE
For many, that's easier said than done


true...

and for the millionth time i get what your saying but there was nothing racist about it... my neighbor IS mexican and he IS an alien... and he came here legaly. There is nothing wrong with being an alien or an immigrant or whatever and whether or not you take offense to it is really not my problem! So you back off! IT WAS A FREAKING JOKE GET OVER IT!

just becuase your from a place where alien means illegal immigrant doesnt mean its racist. the fact is the word alien doesnt mean that someone has illegaly come to this country. im srry for your postion and i respect that you might have problems with me saying that because of where you live but the fact of the matter is i didnt say anything wrong. im not making it racist you are...

Posted by: Security Corporate April 28, 2007 01:17 am

Since when was I suggesting you were racist? I said it was derogatory where I live and some other places scattered across the US. Learn to read plz kthxbye.

Posted by: Tanker April 28, 2007 01:20 am
this whole conversation started with mrmickey suggesting what i said was racist...

Posted by: Security Corporate April 28, 2007 01:26 am

Well that's Micky saying that, not me, so please don't assume I was going along with him. I just wanted to add my comment on to the situation in general.

Posted by: Tanker April 28, 2007 01:28 am
ok then... we dont have a problem

Posted by: mallic May 15, 2007 04:45 pm
ok i have a new law in me and sc's stat m pissed about

if you havn't had your drivers licnsence for 6 months and you are a teen driver your only allowed to drive until 12 pm and you have to have a friend with you when you drive

Posted by: Security Corporate May 16, 2007 08:01 pm
QUOTE (mallic @ May 15, 2007 08:45 am)
if you havn't had your drivers licnsence for 6 months and you are a teen driver your only allowed to drive until 12 pm and you have to have a friend with you when you drive


Are you serious? That's just retarded.

Oh and thanks to Zpin, I've changed my name to "Ari". For the more senior members (Keyes, Hunter, Zombie, Mallic, etc.) you can still call me "SC" if you want, but the rest of you's better start calling me by my new name (or die).

I did it for the lulz. blubbern.gif

Posted by: hunter May 17, 2007 04:46 pm
QUOTE (Ari @ May 16, 2007 07:01 pm)
QUOTE (mallic @ May 15, 2007 08:45 am)
if you havn't had your drivers licnsence for 6 months and you are a teen driver your only allowed to drive until 12 pm and you have to have a friend with you when you drive


Are you serious? That's just retarded.

Oh and thanks to Zpin, I've changed my name to "Ari". For the more senior members (Keyes, Hunter, Zombie, Mallic, etc.) you can still call me "SC" if you want, but the rest of you's better start calling me by my new name (or die).

I did it for the lulz. blubbern.gif

I was actually wondering who the hell is this guy with sc's avatar and sig! Makes sense now, you did that very slyly

Posted by: DavidRoxZoRs August 03, 2007 03:10 am
Good so ill call you SC now. Anyways, on politics. I think our current president of the USA is horrible, your thoughts on this?

Posted by: -=Chris Redfield=- August 03, 2007 06:07 am
QUOTE (DavidRoxZoRs @ August 02, 2007 09:10 pm)
Good so ill call you SC now. Anyways, on politics. I think our current president of the USA is horrible, your thoughts on this?

Actually, what I hate the most is when everyone seems to jump on the bandwagon and hate GW Bush. Most people just hate him, just to hate him without forming any of their own opinions. The only thing most people can say about him is the War on Iraq, tax cuts, and the fact that he looks like a monkey. I'm not aiming this at you, but it just pisses me off when people cannot think for themselves.

Posted by: DavidRoxZoRs August 03, 2007 06:32 am
I dont really have a specific reason, but to me hes just an overall bad president, im not "jumping on the bandwagon" as you put it, i just dont like him. He isnt a very good one in my opinion and i cant wait for the '08 elections.

Posted by: Security Corporate August 03, 2007 06:36 am

I don't like what President Bush is doing, like completely fucking up the war in Iraq, but I don't hate him for it. When people overly bash him without forming reasons I usually tell them to lay off. I think Bush has gone through enough shit during his 8 years, he doesn't need the fact that half the country blindly despises him in his head as well.

Posted by: Nikku August 03, 2007 04:36 pm
Haha bush did it for the lulz

Posted by: mallic August 04, 2007 01:05 pm
I don't hate bush but id like to laugh at him when he speaks XD

Posted by: mrchace August 05, 2007 04:20 am
Is victory in Iraq even attainable in any sense of the word?

Posted by: mallic August 05, 2007 09:12 pm
im all up for taking them over like we did japan, and for those of you who don't know im referring to the treaty we have with japan that makes it illegal for anyone but their police to have firearms. That or we could go roman on them and totally take over the country >_>

Posted by: Nikku August 08, 2007 02:55 am
LuLz, When is America that the "election" is bullshit... No ones votes matter, the government is gay.

If you aren't rich, white, and born into a good family, in the government's eyes, you're useless.

I say fuck it, and do the lulz.

Posted by: Security Corporate August 08, 2007 09:58 am
QUOTE (Nikku @ August 07, 2007 06:55 pm)
If you aren't rich, white, and born into a good family, in the government's eyes, you're useless.

Not entirely true. Thankfully, that is slowly being eradicated by the "gain through merit" ethic.

Posted by: -=Chris Redfield=- August 09, 2007 06:47 am
Actually, if you're poor and have twenty kids, you get a bit of money from the governemnt (called welfare). Not to mention quite a few benefits from being black/hispanic/non-white and/or female. Ever heard of quota?

Posted by: mallic August 12, 2007 11:37 pm
cough this also reminds me of the unfair balance towards "colored" races

BEFORE YOU READ THIS NO I AM NOT RACIST HELL SC IS ASIAN (i think) AND I SOLD HIM POISONESS SUBSTANCES (sulpher) LOL

This is so true and its funny if you think about it cuz its true


You call me:
"redneck"
"Hillbilly"
"Slaker"
"Cracker"
"Honkey"
"Whitey"
"Gringo"
"Sage"
and you think it's OK.

But when I call you:
jungle bunny
spear chunker
coon
wet back
jiggaboo
porch monkey
sand nigger
rag head
towelhead
Camel Jockey
Gook
Spook
NIGGER
KIKE
slant eyes
or Chink
you call me a racist.


--You have the United Negro College Fund.
--You have Martin Luther King Day.
--You have Black History Month.
--You have Cesar Chavez Day.
--You have Yom Hashoah
--You have Ma'uled Al-Nabi
--You have the NAACP.
--You have BET.


--If we had WET(white entertainment television) ...we'd be racist.
--If we had a White Pride Day... you would call us racist.
--If we had white history month... we'd be racist.
--If we had an organization for only whites to "advance" our lives... we'd be racist.
--If we had a college fund that only gave white students scholarships...you know we'd be racist.
--In the Million Man March, you believed that you were marching for your race and rights. If we marched for our race and rights...you would call us racist.
--Did you know that some high school students decided to make a club for only the white students because the other ethnicities had them. they all got sent to court for being racist but the african-american, Latino, and Asia clubs were not even questioned.
--You are proud to be black, brown, yellow and orange, and you're not afraid to announce it. But when we announce our white pride, you call us racists.


I am white.
and
i am proud.
But, you call me a racist.

Why is it that only whites can be racists?

Posted by: iliketoblowzombieheadsoff August 13, 2007 12:00 am
Our view of white people had been ruined.

For one, white people started slavery and that wasn't right.

And all those things you mentioned, if it had the word "white" on them, it will sound racist. Why? Cause it's the norm.

I do have a white friend and he happens to be my best friend, but I can't find him anymore(though he lives here locally).

Mallic, that post changed my view of white people a bit. You're people too.
But...... to think of it, white people started Racism...... unsure.gif

Posted by: Security Corporate August 13, 2007 08:08 am

Personally, I'd find it more convenient to not give a shit. I will only call someone a name if I can also call everyone else that too. For example, I have a right to make white jokes because I make jokes about every other race including my own. I keep things in proportion...

I hate everybody equally. See? I'm not racist.

smile.gif

Posted by: mallic August 13, 2007 12:55 pm
actually we did not start slavery, in fact dark skinned people did. every single nations was founded on slavery, well at least all of the great ones. another fact is that african people sold their children to us before we enslaved them.

list of nations/cities other than usa/england that used slaves
CAVE MEN!
Egypt
London
Finland
Scottland
Denmark
France(french people are actually pretty damn dark if they live near water)
Spain
Portugal
Mexico
Bolivia
Puerto Rico

And most of those places ended slavery after the USA, so i ask you, why are the united stats/white people targeted for the bum rap of being slavers?

Posted by: gordon_frohman August 13, 2007 05:32 pm
wellyou forgot norway.
but they took everyone they saw as slaves . and it ended after the viking period , so does it count ? biggrin.gif

Posted by: -=Chris Redfield=- August 13, 2007 06:03 pm
QUOTE (mallic @ August 13, 2007 06:55 am)
actually we did not start slavery, in fact dark skinned people did. every single nations was founded on slavery, well at least all of the great ones. another fact is that african people sold their children to us before we enslaved them.

list of nations/cities other than usa/england that used slaves
CAVE MEN!
Egypt
London
Finland
Scottland
Denmark
France(french people are actually pretty damn dark if they live near water)
Spain
Portugal
Mexico
Bolivia
Puerto Rico

And most of those places ended slavery after the USA, so i ask you, why are the united stats/white people targeted for the bum rap of being slavers?

You forgot most of Africa. African tribes went to war - and still do - constantly, and the losing is tribe becomes slaves to the other tribe. So, nations would go to these tribes, and buy the losing tribe. We didn't go and nab us some darkies and throw chains on them. Hence why they call it the SLAVE TRADE.

Posted by: mallic August 14, 2007 12:15 am
i know the list is incomplete, i made it just before leaving for school. And thank you all for further proving my point happy.gif

Posted by: iliketoblowzombieheadsoff August 14, 2007 12:29 am
Damn my prejudice and lack of info..... I learned that from the media.


I like white people as long as they're not racist back to me.

I do know a white person who's very concerned about races, and so he makes fun of them through jokes and finds racist comedy as very entertaining.


I don't. I find racism.... just stupid. mad.gif

Posted by: mallic August 14, 2007 01:51 am
i find making fun of people who actually fit the racial stereo types funny, but no classifieing them all in one group

Posted by: Security Corporate August 14, 2007 09:51 am

The United States Bureau of Morality Public Service Announcement

Please call this toll free number, 1-866-445-6580, to see what the department has in store for you.

Your re-education is about to begin.

Posted by: mallic August 14, 2007 12:38 pm
your also the one that threw up the site saying to kill people so shhhh happy.gif

Posted by: Security Corporate August 14, 2007 01:12 pm
QUOTE (mallic @ August 14, 2007 04:38 am)
your also the one that threw up the site saying to kill people so shhhh happy.gif

Which you obviously didn't read thoroughly enough to get the point of it, and it was not killing other people.

Posted by: mallic August 15, 2007 01:19 am
I skimmed happy.gif


and i disagree all humans should die we are a stain on this planet and we never learn to stop messing with nature and defiling her with our unworthy hands. Eventually it will end up making something like the reavers in serenity.

Posted by: Security Corporate August 15, 2007 01:28 am

And yet nature still opens her legs for our selfish uses. Mother Nature is a whore.

Posted by: mallic August 15, 2007 04:40 am
i dunno i think huricane katrina was her period lol

Posted by: iliketoblowzombieheadsoff August 15, 2007 10:21 am
Lol oliol

Your such creative minds have changed the view of Global Warming. laugh.gif laugh.gif

Posted by: mallic August 18, 2007 01:40 am
damn skippy happy.gif

Posted by: Security Corporate August 18, 2007 01:31 pm
QUOTE (mallic @ August 17, 2007 05:40 pm)
damn skippy happy.gif

You bet. Hey, I wonder if petroleum jelly is related to their natural gas counterparts.

Posted by: Nikku September 01, 2007 07:41 pm
why yes it is... it is a by product of making petrol

Posted by: gordon_frohman September 02, 2007 02:18 am
u know its not only humans destroying the planet ,,,

Cows for instance farts about 320 L or so carbon diocide a day.
and the moose is even worse

so much for nature being innocent.

Posted by: mallic September 02, 2007 04:10 am
yes but the earth would have been fine with cow/moose fart if humans didnt come to be

Posted by: Nikku September 03, 2007 03:57 am
emo people need to die, and thats politics

Posted by: iliketoblowzombieheadsoff September 03, 2007 03:59 am
Emo people?

What bad did they do to you? blink.gif

Posted by: Nikku September 03, 2007 04:00 am
They suck the life out of things, they talk about suicide, but dont fallow through.

DO IT AND SHUT THE FUCK UP!

Posted by: -=Chris Redfield=- September 03, 2007 05:30 am
QUOTE (Nikku @ September 02, 2007 10:00 pm)
They suck the life out of things, they talk about suicide, but dont fallow through.

DO IT AND SHUT THE FUCK UP!

Actually, I know a girl that did go through with it...so, yeah.

Posted by: mallic September 03, 2007 09:10 am
how is that political?

Posted by: Security Corporate September 03, 2007 09:44 am

Do not bring emo rage to my thread please. Their annoyance was just a fad. Just leave them alone and they'll stop trying to find people to whine to. Simple as that.

In other news, Clinton, Edwards, and Obama are really at it for this year's elections. Hillary is pretty much doing her own thing and on defensive mode while Edwards is on the critical side at the moment. I haven't read anything substantial that Obama has said, but I think he's sided with Edwards in the sense that he's trying to stop her lead in the polls. Well they're all candidates, so they're going to do that shit anyway.

Either way, I like how we're having a lot of main candidates each year, not just two assholes at a time like the last few elections.

Posted by: mallic September 03, 2007 10:10 am
hmm i predict that neither the black man or the woman will win for the simple fact niether of them will pander to the companies that fund most politicians

Posted by: Security Corporate September 03, 2007 10:29 am

Meh, fuck them. I think they're getting pretty far. I haven't heard anyone saying anything significantly bad just out of race or sex.

Posted by: Nikku September 03, 2007 08:18 pm
QUOTE (-=Chris Redfield=- @ September 03, 2007 05:30 am)
QUOTE (Nikku @ September 02, 2007 10:00 pm)
They suck the life out of things, they talk about suicide, but dont fallow through.

DO IT AND SHUT THE FUCK UP!

Actually, I know a girl that did go through with it...so, yeah.

alright last emo thing, Well then she shouldnt have, becuase she really had a problem but im sick of kids who think there life is hard and its not. No ones life is easy.

Posted by: mallic September 03, 2007 08:54 pm
ALMOST no ones live is easy (bill gates has an easy life lol)

Posted by: SDWBOSS September 03, 2007 10:50 pm
QUOTE (mallic @ September 03, 2007 08:54 pm)
...bill gates has an easy life lol

Isn't it annoying when people say things like

"money can't buy happiness."?

Well, I'd sooner be miserable and rich than miserable and poor! blink.gif

Posted by: Nikku September 03, 2007 11:51 pm
QUOTE (mallic @ September 03, 2007 08:54 pm)
ALMOST no ones live is easy (bill gates has an easy life lol)

No, NO ONES life is easy, thats what i said, and thats the truth.

Posted by: Security Corporate September 04, 2007 12:01 am

GET BACK TO POLITICAL DISCUSSIONS PEOPLE. POPULATION ECONOMICS IS NOT POLITICAL DISCUSSION.

Posted by: SDWBOSS September 04, 2007 12:03 am
Well said.

America should invade Iran, China should stop burning so much coal and oil, and Japan should make the Playstation 4 biggrin.gif

/discuss

Posted by: Nikku September 04, 2007 12:16 am
xomg bush sucks like omg my parents dont get me xomg xomg lol lol myspace! zmog!
Pools closed kiddies.

NUKE THE MIDDLE EAST!

Posted by: mallic September 04, 2007 12:24 am
knock it off nikku

Posted by: Nikku September 04, 2007 12:29 am
Get a sense of humor tongue.gif

Im serious though, nuke it.

Posted by: SDWBOSS September 04, 2007 12:30 am
QUOTE (Nikku @ September 04, 2007 12:16 am)
xomg bush sucks like omg my parents dont get me xomg xomg lol lol myspace! zmog!
Pools closed kiddies.

NUKE THE MIDDLE EAST!

Yeah, that went just that little bit too far I feel...

Posted by: Nikku September 04, 2007 12:32 am
arent any of you patriots, NUKE ALL PEOPLE WHO DONT LIKE THE USA!!!!


more serious note, it might help, maybe a little h-bomb though.

Posted by: Security Corporate September 04, 2007 12:33 am
QUOTE (Nikku @ September 03, 2007 04:32 pm)
arent any of you patriots, NUKE ALL PEOPLE WHO DONT LIKE THE USA!!!!

Are you quite alright? No seriously, stop fucking around. You nail Mallic for being "immature" and now you are puling this shit off? Yeah, get the fuck out my thread.

Posted by: SDWBOSS September 04, 2007 12:34 am
QUOTE (Nikku @ September 04, 2007 12:32 am)
arent any of you patriots, NUKE ALL PEOPLE WHO DONT LIKE THE USA!!!!


more serious note, it might help, maybe a little h-bomb though.

There are some things I just don't like, and nukes are one of them sad.gif
In games or movies they r A-OK but I hate the thought that something the size of a car can take out a whole city ohmy.gif

Posted by: Nikku September 04, 2007 12:40 am
Well i figured that since mallic wasnt gonna stop, imight as well start, but its seem though he has ceased, so shall I.

Posted by: SDWBOSS September 04, 2007 12:45 am
hmm how can I work this in?

I made a *cough* politically relevant video to my *cough* political css movie... politically...

check my little trailer topic biggrin.gif

Posted by: mallic September 10, 2007 01:52 pm
... /me offers a cough drop

Posted by: iliketoblowzombieheadsoff September 11, 2007 01:13 am
LOL laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif

Posted by: Security Corporate October 23, 2007 05:45 am

Keyes, that's why I put states in quotes, because they are not officially states, but are presented similar to that concept. The EU still isn't considered an official country as a whole, more of an alliance. But I think it'd be better off as one nation.

Posted by: gordon_frohman October 23, 2007 03:06 pm
QUOTE (Ari @ October 23, 2007 05:45 am)
Keyes, that's why I put states in quotes, because they are not officially states, but are presented similar to that concept. The EU still isn't considered an official country as a whole, more of an alliance. But I think it'd be better off as one nation.

wtf ..

man you cant do that.

EU is a alliance ,, more like trade alliance somewhat since they DEMAND that we get the same currency ... ( euro ) fuck no .,, i like my NoK biggrin.gif

you think itd be better off as one , you dont even know whats going on in the countries , hell i bet you dont even know what joining EU would mean for example norway.. -.-

Posted by: SDWBOSS October 23, 2007 04:27 pm
Or UK - we shunned the pound cus the British public woke up at the last minute and demanded we keep it.

It means your country has to sign over all your gold to Brussels, who sign it over to Germany. Hmm.. what's the most unstable country in Europe... I know, let's give them all our gold so they can start WW3 and laugh as we throw sticks at them. USA certainly wouldn't help us out if we had no money anymore, nor the rest of Europe. sad.gif

Over here it's know as "The Gravy Train", because they collect billions of Euros and refuse to account for where they go to - into the pockets of the administrators.

So please, Ari, don't say it would be a good idea for Europe to become one super state from over the Atlantic, because it would be BAD, VERY VERY BAD! ohmy.gif

Posted by: gordon_frohman October 23, 2007 09:45 pm
ari said shit he didnt have any clue about.

just as you flamed us europeans because what we said earlier in the discussion.

EU would have taken away norway's main income by letting the spanish take OUR fishing spots.
those bastards.

Posted by: Keyes October 23, 2007 11:56 pm
QUOTE (SDWBOSS @ October 23, 2007 04:27 pm)
Or UK - we shunned the pound cus the British public woke up at the last minute and demanded we keep it.

It means your country has to sign over all your gold to Brussels, who sign it over to Germany. Hmm.. what's the most unstable country in Europe... I know, let's give them all our gold so they can start WW3 and laugh as we throw sticks at them. USA certainly wouldn't help us out if we had no money anymore, nor the rest of Europe. sad.gif

Over here it's know as "The Gravy Train", because they collect billions of Euros and refuse to account for where they go to - into the pockets of the administrators.

So please, Ari, don't say it would be a good idea for Europe to become one super state from over the Atlantic, because it would be BAD, VERY VERY BAD! ohmy.gif

The loss of our own currency plus the grouping together of a bunch of countries that don't particularly like each other wouldn't be the best thing in the world.

Besides, the Euro looks like monopoly money.

Posted by: gordon_frohman October 23, 2007 11:59 pm
QUOTE (Keyes @ October 23, 2007 11:56 pm)
QUOTE (SDWBOSS @ October 23, 2007 04:27 pm)
Or UK - we shunned the pound cus the British public woke up at the last minute and demanded we keep it.

It means your country has to sign over all your gold to Brussels, who sign it over to Germany. Hmm.. what's the most unstable country in Europe... I know, let's give them all our gold so they can start WW3 and laugh as we throw sticks at them. USA certainly wouldn't help us out if we had no money anymore, nor the rest of Europe. sad.gif

Over here it's know as "The Gravy Train", because they collect billions of Euros and refuse to account for where they go to - into the pockets of the administrators.

So please, Ari, don't say it would be a good idea for Europe to become one super state from over the Atlantic, because it would be BAD, VERY VERY BAD! ohmy.gif

The loss of our own currency plus the grouping together of a bunch of countries that don't particularly like each other wouldn't be the best thing in the world.

Besides, the Euro looks like monopoly money.

and with norway not in on the coins..
sweden looks like a penis on the coins...


which is why some people say
" i wish that norway would join in on EU so our EURO coins didnt have sweden looking like a peeeniiss "

yep. they said that once in a whatamaca show

Posted by: Security Corporate October 24, 2007 12:20 am
QUOTE (gordon_frohman @ October 23, 2007 01:45 pm)
ari said shit he didnt have any clue about.

just as you flamed us europeans because what we said earlier in the discussion.

Well sorry I'm not a professional and perfect at world politics like you obviously are.

I gave my try at it and got shot down. Oh lawd.

Posted by: SDWBOSS October 25, 2007 04:22 pm
*reloads

Posted by: Keyes October 26, 2007 04:20 am
I don't normally condone the use of drugs, but in this case, I'll suggest that some people take a chill pill.

Posted by: Security Corporate November 04, 2007 03:11 am

One of the reasons I like what the European Union is doing is because well, it is seemingly improving relations between European countries that have had many historical conflicts with eachother. However, I'm not sure if that really is the case.

Here are some general and personal questions I have about the Union itself:

1) What does a country have to sacrifice or do in order to join the EU?
2) Is the EU really improving relationships between countries there or worsening them?
3) Are things in general (economy, military, culturally, politically) getting better because of the EU?
4) Is the EU having a substantial impact on life in the respective European country you live in?

I know this seems much but I would appreciate if someone (or some people, it would be nice to have more replies to this) answered these because it would help me clarify some of the confusions I have about the subject matter. smile.gif

Posted by: gordon_frohman November 04, 2007 12:14 pm
QUOTE (Ari @ November 04, 2007 03:11 am)
One of the reasons I like what the European Union is doing is because well, it is seemingly improving relations between European countries that have had many historical conflicts with eachother. However, I'm not sure if that really is the case.

Here are some general and personal questions I have about the Union itself:

1) What does a country have to sacrifice or do in order to join the EU?
2) Is the EU really improving relationships between countries there or worsening them?
3) Are things in general (economy, military, culturally, politically) getting better because of the EU?
4) Is the EU having a substantial impact on life in the respective European country you live in?

I know this seems much but I would appreciate if someone (or some people, it would be nice to have more replies to this) answered these because it would help me clarify some of the confusions I have about the subject matter. smile.gif

1)
you have to pay a substantial tax , and places thats your countries "turf" like a nice fishing spot and such becomes available to the other countries.

2)
i have not seen any improvement in the relationships between countries.

3)
Economy gets a tiny bit worse since we have to pay in tax to the HQ , and change the currency.
with less money the military fund would lessen i wager.

culturaly,,, well norway got a fucked up culture that all depends on which part you are in, example : my part of norway a part of the culture is making infernal noises like " heihahahehaheahieihahaaga " and they call it singing,, or joiking.

politically, would be a hard hit here in norway, because if the government that is on now decides to join into EU , where as we the people always says no , ( there was only 1% of the voters last time that voted " hell yes " for EU ) the people will prob go on riot.

4)
havent joined yet. and hopefully wont join,
the impact though is that the closest countries got euro ( finnland and sweden ) ( allthough sweden got both euro and that other coin ,, sek i think )
makes it kinda cheaper to buy things from the other countries... hoorray for cheap beef.

Posted by: SDWBOSS November 04, 2007 09:55 pm
QUOTE (Ari @ November 04, 2007 03:11 am)
One of the reasons I like what the European Union is doing is because well, it is seemingly improving relations between European countries that have had many historical conflicts with eachother. However, I'm not sure if that really is the case.

Here are some general and personal questions I have about the Union itself:

1) What does a country have to sacrifice or do in order to join the EU?
2) Is the EU really improving relationships between countries there or worsening them?
3) Are things in general (economy, military, culturally, politically) getting better because of the EU?
4) Is the EU having a substantial impact on life in the respective European country you live in?

I know this seems much but I would appreciate if someone (or some people, it would be nice to have more replies to this) answered these because it would help me clarify some of the confusions I have about the subject matter. smile.gif

1) You have to send your country' gold to Brussels/Germany, and pay a heavy tax, AND have to surrender some of your country's laws in favour of the EU regulations.

2) Improving some, f*cking up most.
3) Economy - poor countries are doing well, everyone else is worsened
Military- MUCH worsened (the Eurofighter was £5.4 billion over budget)
4) Culturally - massive over-immigration from Poland and Romania, so now you have to learn to speak 3 different languages just to get around London.
5) Politically - really wierd fake handshakes between leaders (they hate eachother really) We have no more personal rights (the right of a thug not to get stabbed in your house at night over-rides you right to defend your property)

Posted by: gordon_frohman November 04, 2007 10:42 pm
in short.

FUCK OF WITH EU

Posted by: SDWBOSS November 04, 2007 11:06 pm
QUOTE (gordon_frohman @ November 04, 2007 10:42 pm)
in short.

FUCK OF WITH EU

ditto

Posted by: Security Corporate November 04, 2007 11:47 pm
QUOTE (gordon_frohman @ November 04, 2007 02:42 pm)
in short.

FUCK OF WITH EU

I want to know because I'm curious. Would you rather have me making assumptions like before or actually getting valid information? Don't give me shit fool, especially when you took the time answering my questions anyway.

Posted by: gordon_frohman November 04, 2007 11:59 pm
QUOTE (Ari @ November 04, 2007 11:47 pm)
QUOTE (gordon_frohman @ November 04, 2007 02:42 pm)
in short.

FUCK OF WITH EU

I want to know because I'm curious. Would you rather have me making assumptions like before or actually getting valid information? Don't give me shit fool, especially when you took the time answering my questions anyway.

i didnt say it towards you , so dont be offended.

i said it toward the concept of EU....

i and sdw gave you cold hard slippery facts.

and im sorry that you felt offended

Posted by: SDWBOSS November 05, 2007 03:26 pm
QUOTE (Ari @ November 04, 2007 11:47 pm)
QUOTE (gordon_frohman @ November 04, 2007 02:42 pm)
in short.

FUCK OF WITH EU

I want to know because I'm curious. Would you rather have me making assumptions like before or actually getting valid information? Don't give me shit fool, especially when you took the time answering my questions anyway.

Uh... I gave you valid answers I thought were appropriate... They weren't intended to sound like "shit, fool."

Posted by: Security Corporate November 05, 2007 06:39 pm
QUOTE (SDWBOSS @ November 05, 2007 07:26 am)
QUOTE (Ari @ November 04, 2007 11:47 pm)
QUOTE (gordon_frohman @ November 04, 2007 02:42 pm)
in short.

FUCK OF WITH EU

I want to know because I'm curious. Would you rather have me making assumptions like before or actually getting valid information? Don't give me shit fool, especially when you took the time answering my questions anyway.

Uh... I gave you valid answers I thought were appropriate... They weren't intended to sound like "shit, fool."

That wasn't directed at you. I misunderstood what Frohman posted and that was towards what he said.

Posted by: SDWBOSS November 05, 2007 07:44 pm
QUOTE (Ari @ November 05, 2007 06:39 pm)
QUOTE (Ari @ November 04, 2007 11:47 pm)

That wasn't directed at you. I misunderstood what Frohman posted and that was towards what he said.

*Hugs Ari* it's ok, honey. Blame the Jews smile.gif

Posted by: mallic November 06, 2007 01:00 am
IRISH REPUBLIC FTW !!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: mallic December 06, 2007 06:36 pm
bump + statement

Upcoming election many choices who are you voting for?

Posted by: Security Corporate December 07, 2007 04:14 am

Well who are the concrete choices? Main candidates that actually do stand a chance? I have a list but I just want to clarify.

Either way my vote would go to Rudy.

Posted by: gordon_frohman December 11, 2007 01:01 am
id chose the afro-american,

so the afro-american side of USA can say " Damn dogg ! we got uz a niggaz in da white house foo ! " tongue.gif

Posted by: SDWBOSS December 11, 2007 09:05 pm
Perhaps someone should flip a coin? Either way it's another commercially controlled puppet hanging over the ex-most powerful nation on earth sad.gif

It would be nice if someone actually became president because they had a dream for the country, unfortunately that just doesn't sell.

Posted by: gordon_frohman December 11, 2007 10:54 pm
my favorite president was billy boy - Bill Clinton biggrin.gif

he pwned !

Posted by: Tanker December 11, 2007 11:02 pm
QUOTE (SDWBOSS @ December 11, 2007 09:05 pm)
Perhaps someone should flip a coin? Either way it's another commercially controlled puppet hanging over the ex-most powerful nation on earth sad.gif

It would be nice if someone actually became president because they had a dream for the country, unfortunately that just doesn't sell.

watch lions for lambs thats exactly what that movie is about

Posted by: mallic December 11, 2007 11:23 pm
I will run for president! I will bring america back inwards and make it self supporting (of course the sad part is that only way to do this is war) hark I will get rid of homeless by manditory military service/civil jobs. I will balance the defect by blowing up the countries we owe XD

Posted by: Tanker December 13, 2007 03:18 am
well im sure that would all work but it would make a lot people unhappy

Posted by: mallic December 13, 2007 04:12 am
indeed

RUDY FTL he was married to his 3rd cousin for 10 years and didn't know it EWWW

Posted by: Security Corporate December 19, 2007 11:11 am
QUOTE (mallic @ December 12, 2007 08:12 pm)
indeed

RUDY FTL he was married to his 3rd cousin for 10 years and didn't know it EWWW

Political incest is fucking hawt. We need to have more discussion on that subject. I think it's politically related enough.

And I think it was his 2nd cousin, not his 3rd. smile.gif

Posted by: SDWBOSS December 19, 2007 12:26 pm
QUOTE (Ari @ December 19, 2007 11:11 am)
And I think it was his 2nd cousin, not his 3rd.  smile.gif

"EEWWW"?
In Wales people sleep with their sisters anyway, what's the problem?
Well done on reading this, that means you are clever enough to realise this is only a joke.
We do not sleep with our sisters in wales, that's disgusting.
A blowjob is one thing...

Posted by: mallic December 19, 2007 01:13 pm
AHAHAH thats just great sdw i laughed my ass off when i read the second part

Posted by: Nikku January 26, 2008 11:32 pm
QUOTE (mallic @ December 11, 2007 11:23 pm)
I will run for president! I will bring america back inwards and make it self supporting (of course the sad part is that only way to do this is war) hark I will get rid of homeless by manditory military service/civil jobs. I will balance the defect by blowing up the countries we owe XD

Im still voting for ron paul

Posted by: Security Corporate January 27, 2008 08:53 am

The popularity of Republicans at the moment is slightly overwhelming. There are quite a bit more Republican candidates than there are Democrat.

Even if I was old enough to vote, I wouldn't, as the procedure is useless and is only for show. To win by electoral college even if the entire public is against you is ridiculous.

Posted by: mallic January 29, 2008 01:15 am
then vote your senators out of office moron >_<

Also in the spirit of crooked politicians I would like to take the time to remember one who was innocent and did what he could to provide for his family after a false bribery charge was stuck on him. This man is Budd Dwyer and he was a state treasurer. He killed himself so that his family would get the senator's pension and could live the rest of their lives.

be warned this is a video of him shooting himself. It is uncut and if you do not like the sight of blood DO NOT WATCH THIS!
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=860c9b9f3b&p=1

Posted by: Security Corporate January 29, 2008 05:10 am

We vote for senators? You sure? I thought we just directly vote for representatives and senators were elected by the lower house. What I meant by not voting is voting for a presidential candidate. That shit is just stupid.

Anyway, that video is fucked up man. It took awhile for people to notice he had a gun. That .357 should have been way louder though. But besides that fact, that action was crazy. Read up on Budd a little more. Wow, what a guy...

Posted by: mallic January 29, 2008 12:24 pm
that footage was taken from a news camera with sound filtering thats why every thing is more quiet then it should be.


and yes we elect our senators through voting.

Posted by: SDWBOSS January 30, 2008 03:01 pm
Holy shit. I've never ever seen anything like that. Are you sure it was real?
That really disturbed me.

Posted by: gordon_frohman January 30, 2008 03:26 pm
QUOTE (mallic @ January 29, 2008 01:15 am)
then vote your senators out of office moron >_<

Also in the spirit of crooked politicians I would like to take the time to remember one who was innocent and did what he could to provide for his family after a false bribery charge was stuck on him. This man is Budd Dwyer and he was a state treasurer. He killed himself so that his family would get the senator's pension and could live the rest of their lives.

be warned this is a video of him shooting himself. It is uncut and if you do not like the sight of blood DO NOT WATCH THIS!
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=860c9b9f3b&p=1

great man then ohmy.gif

Posted by: mallic January 30, 2008 06:22 pm
yes it's real google his name followed by wiki

Posted by: Nikku January 31, 2008 02:41 am
I've seen it before, anyone seen the bjork stalker suicide video? He shoots himself in the face, but doesn't die instantly, so around 30 secounds of him going "HNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNG" insues.
What do you expect from the Interbutts?!

http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/Budd_Dwyer

Posted by: mallic January 31, 2008 03:03 am
that is what a bad suicide can do. The best way is to shoot through the spine into the skull to cause paralysis and death from bleeding

Posted by: iliketoblowzombieheadsoff January 31, 2008 06:33 am
Man... that crazy suicide.... can anyone summarize it to me please?

All I know is that he did this since he was sentenced in jail... but.. I'm a bit too lazy to find it out. Just some background info will do, if anyone wishes to share.

Kind of disturbing to kill himself on camera.

Posted by: SDWBOSS January 31, 2008 01:02 pm
Well actually if you shoot yourself through the spine, the bullet could ricochet through your body and miss the spinal chord and brain. If the bullet has enough energy to get through the spine then you may as well shoot yourself in the head I guess...

Posted by: Elite viking January 31, 2008 01:19 pm
Why bother going through the spine? A bullet through the brain will instantly kill, as long as it hits. But actually, there's a chance the bullet willl richochet off the skull.

The best way to go is probably jumping from somewhere high. Just imagine the fun you can have on the way down wink.gif

Posted by: SDWBOSS January 31, 2008 01:44 pm
QUOTE (Elite viking @ January 31, 2008 01:19 pm)
Why bother going through the spine? A bullet through the brain will instantly kill, as long as it hits. But actually, there's a chance the bullet willl richochet off the skull.

The best way to go is probably jumping from somewhere high. Just imagine the fun you can have on the way down wink.gif

Imagine the mess and clearup ohmy.gif
I think if your fired a gun that is pressed perpendicular to your skull, it's very very very very likely you will die instantly. Especially with a bigger gun I suppose.

Posted by: Keyes January 31, 2008 03:36 pm
QUOTE (iliketoblowzombieheadsoff @ January 31, 2008 05:33 am)
Man... that crazy suicide.... can anyone summarize it to me please?

All I know is that he did this since he was sentenced in jail... but.. I'm a bit too lazy to find it out. Just some background info will do, if anyone wishes to share.

Kind of disturbing to kill himself on camera.

He was gonna be sentenced to a long time in jail - maximum sentence was 55 years I believe - for allegedly receiving a $300,000 dollar kickback while in office. Despite his claims that he was innocent, he was still being sentenced, but he was able to hold his office as treasurer until the day of his sentencing. So he called a press conference, gave a speech, handed out some papers, took a .357 magnum revolver from a brown envelope, put it in his mouth, and shot himself.

A theory is that he did it so his family would get the full survivor's benefits - $1.28 million - as he was still in office when he shot himself, as the legal defense costs were astronomical.

Explained enough?

Credit to Wikipedia.

Posted by: SDWBOSS January 31, 2008 04:50 pm
I didn't see what those papers were he gave out. Any ideas?

Posted by: mallic January 31, 2008 06:25 pm
they were suicide notes to his family. and friends

Posted by: _CiviliaN^SoldieR_ January 31, 2008 11:15 pm
sleep.gif

Posted by: -=Chris Redfield=- January 31, 2008 11:22 pm
QUOTE (SDWBOSS @ January 31, 2008 06:44 am)
QUOTE (Elite viking @ January 31, 2008 01:19 pm)
Why bother going through the spine? A bullet through the brain will instantly kill, as long as it hits. But actually, there's a chance the bullet willl richochet off the skull.

The best way to go is probably jumping from somewhere high. Just imagine the fun you can have on the way down wink.gif

Imagine the mess and clearup ohmy.gif
I think if your fired a gun that is pressed perpendicular to your skull, it's very very very very likely you will die instantly. Especially with a bigger gun I suppose.

I was told that a .22 pistol would be ideal, as the bullet would pretty much bounce around inside the skull and brain, since it wouldn't create an exit wound.

Posted by: _CiviliaN^SoldieR_ January 31, 2008 11:24 pm
Seeing as we've all become to a discussion on how to kill ourselves, I'd say point the gun at a centered upward angle from your eye.

Posted by: Keyes January 31, 2008 11:36 pm
QUOTE (-=Chris Redfield=- @ January 31, 2008 10:22 pm)
I was told that a .22 pistol would be ideal, as the bullet would pretty much bounce around inside the skull and brain, since it wouldn't create an exit wound.

They were wrong. The Finnish guy who went on a shooting spree at his school in Finland shot himself in the head with a .22 pistol. He died quite a long time later in hospital, because the small calibre of the bullet wasn't enough to kill him, and the police didn't enter the building until a few hours later.

Posted by: mallic February 01, 2008 12:05 am
actually keys he is half right. A .22 will do that but only if it is fired into the skull at a certain angle

Posted by: Nikku February 01, 2008 12:41 am
Shooting your spine is a waste, just aim for the head. Swallow your gun of put it to your temple.

My personal favorite is Auto-erotic asphyxiation

What's with people (not necessarily on these forums) thinking that a bullet goes on a straight path through objects, a bullet changes course when it goes through something.

Posted by: iliketoblowzombieheadsoff February 01, 2008 01:03 am
QUOTE (Keyes @ January 31, 2008 06:36 am)
QUOTE (iliketoblowzombieheadsoff @ January 31, 2008 05:33 am)
Man... that crazy suicide.... can anyone summarize it to me please?

All I know is that he did this since he was sentenced in jail... but.. I'm a bit too lazy to find it out. Just some background info will do, if anyone wishes to share.

Kind of disturbing to kill himself on camera.

He was gonna be sentenced to a long time in jail - maximum sentence was 55 years I believe - for allegedly receiving a $300,000 dollar kickback while in office. Despite his claims that he was innocent, he was still being sentenced, but he was able to hold his office as treasurer until the day of his sentencing. So he called a press conference, gave a speech, handed out some papers, took a .357 magnum revolver from a brown envelope, put it in his mouth, and shot himself.

A theory is that he did it so his family would get the full survivor's benefits - $1.28 million - as he was still in office when he shot himself, as the legal defense costs were astronomical.

Explained enough?

Credit to Wikipedia.

Thanks, Keyes.

I feel sorry for this guy... very sad for killing himself in public.

Posted by: mallic February 01, 2008 01:20 am
nikku if it is a high caliber round it has a good chance of punching a straight hole

Posted by: SDWBOSS February 01, 2008 11:13 pm
Nikku no-one thinks a bullet goes in a straight line - no bullet in the world can even go in a straight line through air, nevermind a skull or spine.
If you're gonna do it, do it right and put a big gun like an AW50F (2"x5" projectile ohmy.gif) against your head and pull the trigger with an elastic band biggrin.gif

Posted by: Nikku February 04, 2008 03:15 am
QUOTE (SDWBOSS @ February 01, 2008 11:13 pm)
Nikku no-one thinks a bullet goes in a straight line - no bullet in the world can even go in a straight line through air, nevermind a skull or spine.
If you're gonna do it, do it right and put a big gun like an AW50F (2"x5" projectile ohmy.gif) against your head and pull the trigger with an elastic band biggrin.gif

No, it seems like a lot of people think bullets go on a straight path to and through their targets

Posted by: Security Corporate February 04, 2008 03:51 am

Make a new thread if you guys feel the need to discuss the importance of what bullets do what. Please get back on the political side of things now.

Posted by: mallic February 05, 2008 11:12 pm
What did you all think of the Florida primary's

Posted by: Security Corporate February 06, 2008 12:27 am

If Rudy would have put more fucking effort into it, he could have gotten in either with or without McCain. This is retarded.

2008's candidates = phail

Posted by: -=Chris Redfield=- February 06, 2008 09:09 am
Popular vote = phail. So just go with it. And the fact that I'm an Independent also doesn't help in Florida.

Posted by: gordon_frohman February 06, 2008 02:19 pm
i ar not from US and A ..

allthough i gotta agree with fifty...
if obama gets presidentialisized then he have a big chance of getting murdered sad.gif
damn the racists

Posted by: Nikku February 07, 2008 02:26 am
QUOTE (gordon_frohman @ February 06, 2008 02:19 pm)
i ar not from US and A ..

allthough i gotta agree with fifty...
if obama gets presidentialisized then he have a big chance of getting murdered sad.gif
damn the racists

Nigga don't talk shit about the USA

Posted by: Security Corporate February 07, 2008 03:28 am
QUOTE (Nikku @ February 06, 2008 06:26 pm)
QUOTE (gordon_frohman @ February 06, 2008 02:19 pm)
i ar not from US and A ..

allthough i gotta agree with fifty...
if obama gets presidentialisized then he have a big chance of getting murdered sad.gif
damn the racists

Nigga don't talk shit about the USA

Bitch just got owned. blubbern.gif

Posted by: SDWBOSS February 07, 2008 01:39 pm
QUOTE (Nikku @ February 07, 2008 02:26 am)
QUOTE (gordon_frohman @ February 06, 2008 02:19 pm)
i ar not from US and A ..

allthough i gotta agree with fifty...
if obama gets presidentialisized then he have a big chance of getting murdered sad.gif
damn the racists

Nigga don't talk shit about the USA

? That was very immature.

Posted by: Nikku February 09, 2008 04:40 pm
QUOTE (SDWBOSS @ February 07, 2008 01:39 pm)
QUOTE (Nikku @ February 07, 2008 02:26 am)
QUOTE (gordon_frohman @ February 06, 2008 02:19 pm)
i ar not from US and A ..

allthough i gotta agree with fifty...
if obama gets presidentialisized then he have a big chance of getting murdered sad.gif
damn the racists

Nigga don't talk shit about the USA

? That was very immature.

oh lighten up laugh.gif cool.gif

Posted by: SDWBOSS February 09, 2008 09:20 pm
QUOTE (Nikku @ February 09, 2008 04:40 pm)
QUOTE (SDWBOSS @ February 07, 2008 01:39 pm)
QUOTE (Nikku @ February 07, 2008 02:26 am)
QUOTE (gordon_frohman @ February 06, 2008 02:19 pm)
i ar not from US and A ..

allthough i gotta agree with fifty...
if obama gets presidentialisized then he have a big chance of getting murdered sad.gif
damn the racists

Nigga don't talk shit about the USA

? That was very immature.

oh lighten up laugh.gif cool.gif

^^ There's a party in my head! biggrin.gif

Gordon Brown is on the way out... I hope...

Posted by: Nikku February 19, 2008 12:59 am
MY PRETTIES! I POO-POO FAIRIES!

Posted by: _CiviliaN^SoldieR_ February 19, 2008 12:20 pm
Amen to that SDWBOSS.


Wow, Nikku, you got problems! <3

Posted by: Elite viking February 19, 2008 04:26 pm
When Civ uses the hearts he is at his most furious. Could it be because HE IS THE DARKNESS INCARNATE AND EATS OTHER PEOPLE'S HEARTS?


maybe?

Posted by: SDWBOSS February 19, 2008 08:58 pm
QUOTE (Elite viking @ February 19, 2008 04:26 pm)
When Civ uses the hearts he is at his most furious. Could it be because HE IS THE DARKNESS INCARNATE AND EATS OTHER PEOPLE'S HEARTS?


maybe?

Well duh tongue.gif

Posted by: _CiviliaN^SoldieR_ February 20, 2008 12:09 am
Hehe, no it's because I'm a kind and loving gentle soul!

<3

tongue.gif

Posted by: mallic February 25, 2008 10:24 am
just heard the song welcome to 1984 after a long time a couple of minutes ago.
Actually raises some good points. The current state of government hasn't changed since pre-gulf war. We are still fighting in the same place and are pushing the very virtues that the allies fought the nazi's for.

Hitler hated gays - Our president speaks openly about gays being immoral and wrong
Hitler also controlled thought, media, gun laws, and the right to protest. - the bush administration has put forth laws that make any doctor able to take away your right to bear arms, the administration also put forth a bill (that passed) that can stop any act that can be construed as forcefully persuasive which through loose language could be made to (and has already) take down public protests that had no violent incidents and did not disrupt anything.

`(1) HOMEGROWN TERRORISM- The term `homegrown terrorism' means the use, planned use, or threatened use, of force or violence by a group or individual born, raised, or based and operating primarily within the United States or any possession of the United States to intimidate or coerce the United States government, the civilian population of the United States, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.

Dictionary.com research query: force
6. persuasive power; power to convince: They felt the force of his arguments.

American Heritage Dictionary
# Intellectual power or vigor, especially as conveyed in writing or speech.
# Moral strength.
# A capacity for affecting the mind or behavior; efficacy: the force of logical argumentation.
# A body of persons or other resources organized or available for a certain purpose: a large labor force.
# A person or group capable of influential action: a retired senator who is still a force in national politics.

if you are to lazy to read my argument I found a user made argument
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9wJsovPRTEM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5NJoZRYOJk&feature=related

Posted by: Elite viking February 25, 2008 11:03 am
Well it wasn't the songwriters idea, the song was based on the book 1984 by Orwell, written a long time ago.

But still it's a doubleplus good song tongue.gif

Posted by: mallic February 25, 2008 11:14 am
I know about the book, but the song reminded me of it

also HR2640 is evil happy.gif
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGfFVpKZ7iE
*note I do not agree with the idiot in that video about his website but this blog is somewhat intelligent unlike his website

Posted by: Security Corporate May 11, 2008 08:53 am

It would seem Obama has his nomination secured. This is going to be a very interesting election. Here we have McCain, republication mostly in name, and a most controversial opposing candidate who is black AND has an Islamic name to boot. That'd be something right there.

So for all you IronOakers, American or not, what do you think of this turnout and who would you personally go for?

Posted by: mallic May 12, 2008 06:10 pm
vote independent fuck you republicans and democrats

Posted by: Smachine May 12, 2008 07:08 pm
If I where US citizen, definitely would not vote for any republican, Hillary is crazy and she also hates violent videogames so she would never ever get my vote too, Obama looks decent.

Posted by: iliketoblowzombieheadsoff May 13, 2008 12:17 am
QUOTE (mallic @ May 12, 2008 09:10 am)
vote independent fuck you republicans and democrats

Anarchy ftw lolz


We need a stable leader.... I don't like obama, Clinton OR mccain. That's all. biggrin.gif

Posted by: -=Chris Redfield=- May 13, 2008 07:05 pm
I wouldn't vote for either of the candidates. Don't like any of them.

Posted by: Elite viking May 13, 2008 09:59 pm
I like Obama. Change is what the US needs the most, fresh blood to the political game instead of oldtimers like McCain or Clinton.

That said, any one of them are better than the current moron.

Posted by: Smachine May 14, 2008 10:51 am
QUOTE (-=Chris Redfield=- @ May 13, 2008 07:05 pm)
I wouldn't vote for either of the candidates. Don't like any of them.

What a bad attitude dude! Theres always one that you prefer more than other. Theres never a candidate thats perfect to everyone you just have to make the best of them win, even if its choosing from 2 evils the least, because of people like you the fanatical idiot got voted in like 2 times? Also whats wrong with Obama, seems like a reasonable guy compared to religious fanatics of republicans and crazy Hillary. Also is there even such a thing like independent candidate in US, haven't heard about it how can he be nominated? unsure.gif

Posted by: _CiviliaN^SoldieR_ May 14, 2008 02:32 pm
Obama.

Posted by: Lundquist May 14, 2008 03:43 pm
The election is going to be an interesting one for the US if for no other reason than to finally prove which one america hates more, The Black Man or The Bitch? The only other choice is an aged, sagging, middle age, middle class, white guy with his fingers firmly wedged in the pie!

Plus if Hilary Clinton gets elected the same 2 families will have been in control of the US since 1989! thats about 20 years and if she gets re-elected for a second term they'll have been there nearly 30.

And who says america doesn't have fair and impartial elections?....

Posted by: mallic May 14, 2008 06:13 pm
are we counting in the fact that our elected officials are spending electoral votes against what most people are voting. Also note the fact that media killed that good candidates early

Posted by: -=Chris Redfield=- May 14, 2008 07:06 pm
QUOTE (Smachine @ May 14, 2008 03:51 am)
QUOTE (-=Chris Redfield=- @ May 13, 2008 07:05 pm)
I wouldn't vote for either of the candidates. Don't like any of them.

What a bad attitude dude! Theres always one that you prefer more than other. Theres never a candidate thats perfect to everyone you just have to make the best of them win, even if its choosing from 2 evils the least, because of people like you the fanatical idiot got voted in like 2 times? Also whats wrong with Obama, seems like a reasonable guy compared to religious fanatics of republicans and crazy Hillary. Also is there even such a thing like independent candidate in US, haven't heard about it how can he be nominated? unsure.gif

America is fucked up with the voting. Only two major political parties. Two. It's bullshit. Either way, our Senators are more important than the President. Hell, voting for your local mayor has more of an impact on your life than the President.

Posted by: Smachine May 14, 2008 07:39 pm
Wow, I had impression that US has president with pretty big "political power", not like the representative figure we have where I live. Damn lived with this error all my life. Of course wars and research bans don't really affect everyday life of you most likely.
mallic, what candidates, in what way they where so good and better than the current leaders?

Posted by: -=Chris Redfield=- May 15, 2008 06:18 am
QUOTE (Smachine @ May 14, 2008 12:39 pm)
Wow, I had impression that US has president with pretty big "political power", not like the representative figure we have where I live. Damn lived with this error all my life. Of course wars and research bans don't really affect everyday life of you most likely.
mallic, what candidates, in what way they where so good and better than the current leaders?

You never heard of Checks and Balances I presume.

Posted by: mallic May 15, 2008 07:20 am
ron paul

Posted by: Smachine May 15, 2008 02:42 pm
QUOTE (-=Chris Redfield=- @ May 15, 2008 06:18 am)
You never heard of Checks and Balances I presume.

Yes, as I'm not american you know. Of course the president doesn't declare war or something single, the congress must agree or whats the procedure there, but what difference does it make? If the president doesn't support it it isn't happening, so you gotta be wise about what you vote there.

mallic, what is so good about him, what sets him away from all the other republican fanatics. Also whats his stance on embryonic stem cell research and possible use in future?

Posted by: Security Corporate May 16, 2008 05:55 am

Ok, what's with your overuse of "republican fanatics"? It's a cheap term, and if you're going to use it, you might as well mask ALL the polititians in the US as fanatics.

And no, the US President is not God here. Under the Constitution, such a happening will always be impossible. Have there been presidents who ignored the Constitution, and all other parts of the Checks and Balances system? Yes, like Andrew Jackson for example, who completely ignored supreme court ruling. But it doesn't mean it's a good example of what a president should be.

So what if a president doesn't support a program Congress makes up? If Congress is strong enough, they can still pass a bill even if the president vetoes it. There's also impeachment. True, the president is still an influence, but the position shouldn't deserve too much credit, as the collective of polititians run the country, not just the president.

Posted by: Smachine May 16, 2008 07:51 am
QUOTE (Security Corporate @ May 16, 2008 05:55 am)
Ok, what's with your overuse of "republican fanatics"? It's a cheap term, and if you're going to use it, you might as well mask ALL the polititians in the US as fanatics.

And no, the US President is not God here. Under the Constitution, such a happening will always be impossible. Have there been presidents who ignored the Constitution, and all other parts of the Checks and Balances system? Yes, like Andrew Jackson for example, who completely ignored supreme court ruling. But it doesn't mean it's a good example of what a president should be.

So what if a president doesn't support a program Congress makes up? If Congress is strong enough, they can still pass a bill even if the president vetoes it. There's also impeachment. True, the president is still an influence, but the position shouldn't deserve too much credit, as the collective of polititians run the country, not just the president.

But they are all indeed religious fanatics from what I see living in a completely different part on the earth, just some more than others, so its better to support those that aren't totally lost. Also what you said only matters when the congress is strong enough eh (which was not the case with stem cell thing?) Maybe you guys misunderstood me, I'm not saying president is the only important thing to care about but its one of them, you gotta be wise about anything you vote about and not caring is just dumb tbh, I mean the guy you vote in will represent your country and you want it look good eh?

Posted by: -=Chris Redfield=- May 16, 2008 07:39 pm
QUOTE (Smachine @ May 16, 2008 12:51 am)
QUOTE (Security Corporate @ May 16, 2008 05:55 am)
Ok, what's with your overuse of "republican fanatics"? It's a cheap term, and if you're going to use it, you might as well mask ALL the polititians in the US as fanatics.

And no, the US President is not God here. Under the Constitution, such a happening will always be impossible. Have there been presidents who ignored the Constitution, and all other parts of the Checks and Balances system? Yes, like Andrew Jackson for example, who completely ignored supreme court ruling. But it doesn't mean it's a good example of what a president should be.

So what if a president doesn't support a program Congress makes up? If Congress is strong enough, they can still pass a bill even if the president vetoes it. There's also impeachment. True, the president is still an influence, but the position shouldn't deserve too much credit, as the collective of polititians run the country, not just the president.

But they are all indeed religious fanatics from what I see living in a completely different part on the earth, just some more than others, so its better to support those that aren't totally lost. Also what you said only matters when the congress is strong enough eh (which was not the case with stem cell thing?) Maybe you guys misunderstood me, I'm not saying president is the only important thing to care about but its one of them, you gotta be wise about anything you vote about and not caring is just dumb tbh, I mean the guy you vote in will represent your country and you want it look good eh?

You're forgetting the part where the popular vote means jack-shit.

Posted by: Smachine May 16, 2008 08:09 pm
What you mean by that ?

Posted by: Security Corporate May 17, 2008 02:25 am
QUOTE (Smachine @ May 16, 2008 12:09 pm)
What you mean by that ?

He means the popular vote means jack-shit. smile.gif There's nothing to be wise about in voting for the president, as the election of a presidential candidate is unfortunately decided by the electoral college instead of the popular vote.

From my knowledge, the popular vote only holds sway in electing representatives and senators. Fuck voting for a commander-in-chief if it doesn't do anything other than show worthless statistics.

Posted by: Smachine May 20, 2008 08:42 pm
QUOTE (Security Corporate @ May 17, 2008 02:25 am)
QUOTE (Smachine @ May 16, 2008 12:09 pm)
What you mean by that ?

He means the popular vote means jack-shit. smile.gif There's nothing to be wise about in voting for the president, as the election of a presidential candidate is unfortunately decided by the electoral college instead of the popular vote.

From my knowledge, the popular vote only holds sway in electing representatives and senators. Fuck voting for a commander-in-chief if it doesn't do anything other than show worthless statistics.

So you are saying that Bush didn't vetoed alone the founding of embryonic stem cell research? From what I have viewed on net all other instances where not against this. Maybe you just care about how well the trash is taken out or how good the streets are? This is a pretty hot thing in other places as well, like UK, its a shame that so many people don;t realize the big potential in medicine with it. I'm sure if a democratic party candidate where won instead of Bush he would have been more sensible about this.

Posted by: Security Corporate May 21, 2008 02:55 am
QUOTE (Smachine @ May 20, 2008 12:42 pm)
QUOTE (Security Corporate @ May 17, 2008 02:25 am)
QUOTE (Smachine @ May 16, 2008 12:09 pm)
What you mean by that ?

He means the popular vote means jack-shit. smile.gif There's nothing to be wise about in voting for the president, as the election of a presidential candidate is unfortunately decided by the electoral college instead of the popular vote.

From my knowledge, the popular vote only holds sway in electing representatives and senators. Fuck voting for a commander-in-chief if it doesn't do anything other than show worthless statistics.

So you are saying that Bush didn't vetoed alone the founding of embryonic stem cell research? From what I have viewed on net all other instances where not against this. Maybe you just care about how well the trash is taken out or how good the streets are? This is a pretty hot thing in other places as well, like UK, its a shame that so many people don;t realize the big potential in medicine with it. I'm sure if a democratic party candidate where won instead of Bush he would have been more sensible about this.

What are you talking about? What does that have to do with anything we've been discussing?

Anyway getting to answering you, yes, the majority of Capitalist America agreed with Bush and is too stupid to recognize the meaning of scientific and technological advancement. However, it was Bush's decision to veto it. There's nothing the people could have done to stop that.

Posted by: mallic May 21, 2008 06:24 am
the way it works is that if the pres vetoes something then the senate/house of representatives have a vote to decide whether they still will pass the bill but that rarely happens

Posted by: Smachine May 21, 2008 08:34 am
QUOTE (Security Corporate @ May 21, 2008 02:55 am)
Anyway getting to answering you, yes, the majority of Capitalist America agreed with Bush and is too stupid to recognize the meaning of scientific and technological advancement. However, it was Bush's decision to veto it. There's nothing the people could have done to stop that.

Umm, how about not voting for him (or any republican for that matter) in first place? This was my point from whole beginning on stepping into this discussion. You think its not an important research maybe? mallic, and you don't call that a big influence and power on important decisions president has to make?

Posted by: mallic May 21, 2008 06:02 pm
Fix your grammar...

Posted by: Smachine May 21, 2008 06:10 pm
QUOTE (mallic @ May 21, 2008 06:02 pm)
Fix your grammar...

Wheres the mistake, I cant find it lol! ph34r.gif

Posted by: mallic May 21, 2008 06:19 pm
your sentences don't run together well and the subject matter is confused and the meaning is lost

Posted by: Smachine May 21, 2008 06:22 pm
QUOTE (mallic @ May 21, 2008 06:19 pm)
your sentences don't run together well and the subject matter is confused and the meaning is lost

Sorry, can't really do a lot about it other than improving trough writing, as english isn't my first language, but technically thats not a grammar mistake?

Posted by: mallic May 21, 2008 06:28 pm
sentence structure is technically part of grammar

and oh didn't know english was not your primary language

Posted by: Security Corporate May 24, 2008 03:43 am
QUOTE (Smachine @ May 21, 2008 12:34 am)
QUOTE (Security Corporate @ May 21, 2008 02:55 am)
Anyway getting to answering you, yes, the majority of Capitalist America agreed with Bush and is too stupid to recognize the meaning of scientific and technological advancement. However, it was Bush's decision to veto it. There's nothing the people could have done to stop that.

Umm, how about not voting for him (or any republican for that matter) in first place? This was my point from whole beginning on stepping into this discussion. You think its not an important research maybe?

Again, you're not getting what I'm trying to say here. Is it so hard?

I like stem cell research. I like technology. I like advancement. Problem is that many people here are complacent. Sure, it's easy for you to say not to vote for him. Ok. Let's say NO one votes for conservative people like that. It still doesn't make a difference.

If a Republican candidate wants to ban stem cell research, then by God he's going to ban it even IF all the regular population of America disagree.

The only way we could stop a candidate like that is to SOMEHOW directly influece the delegates and officials from the electoral college that ARE the deciding factor in the vote.

The United States is a Federal Republic. Do you see the word Democracy in there? No! We're not as democratic as people would like to think. We might be on the lower levels of government, but in the Executive branch it ain't worth nothing.

Posted by: mallic May 24, 2008 06:15 am
thats only if you look via a shallow view. In the long run by voting for local people and telling them who to vote for, we push the electoral vote in our favor. Most people don't see this when they vote for senetors and keep re-electing the same morons that don't vote for their interests

Posted by: -=Chris Redfield=- May 24, 2008 04:29 pm
QUOTE (mallic @ May 23, 2008 11:15 pm)
thats only if you look via a shallow view. In the long run by voting for local people and telling them who to vote for, we push the electoral vote in our favor. Most people don't see this when they vote for senetors and keep re-electing the same morons that don't vote for their interests

Someone is on the same page as me. smile.gif

Posted by: Security Corporate May 25, 2008 10:26 am
QUOTE (Security Corporate @ May 23, 2008 07:43 pm)
The only way we could stop a candidate like that is to SOMEHOW directly influece the delegates and officials from the electoral college that ARE the deciding factor in the vote.

Posting this part again just in case anyone missed it. The view isn't shallow if it's true. I've no room to "view" greater beyond the obvious because the chances of American citizens voting for people that add to the bigger picture is extremely unlikely. Not many people here know how the system even works.

Posted by: mallic May 25, 2008 09:31 pm
then you enlighten them. Just because your community is a large sheepish group lusting to be dominated by corporate america, does not mean that with the correct influences and instruction they cannot become good helpful citizens; with voting prowess and the ability to never get somone as stupid as bush in office again.

Posted by: Security Corporate May 26, 2008 03:30 am

I'm going to throw my support for a large scale Communist uprising. The USSR may have failed, but a Communist United States will be a deadly force to be reckoned with.

Anyway, I've geeked out about that enough, now back to the way real life works. sad.gif

Posted by: mallic May 28, 2008 08:46 pm
communism always fails

Posted by: iliketoblowzombieheadsoff May 29, 2008 04:03 am
Yep, communism is total phail. Stupid command economy.... sad.gif
Stalin could've had a chance if the command economy was great. But, no... it made it worse for them communists. Lulz! biggrin.gif

Posted by: Smachine May 29, 2008 06:03 am
QUOTE (iliketoblowzombieheadsoff @ May 29, 2008 04:03 am)
Yep, communism is total phail. Stupid command economy.... sad.gif
Stalin could've had a chance if the command economy was great. But, no... it made it worse for them communists. Lulz! biggrin.gif

Umm, have you ever lived in communist country to talk about it? I guess not. Communism was pretty decent, at least thats what my grandfather says. Stalin could've had a chance of doing what? If there was something bad about communism then it was he (while he was the man who made Lenins ideas come to life).

Posted by: iliketoblowzombieheadsoff May 29, 2008 07:14 am
Hey, I was joking around, not being serious. Trying to fit in the political discussions thread since I learned a bit more about it. You don't see me post here often.

Go ahead and flame me though, since I posted stupid stuff in a serious matter(hey some did too).

Posted by: mallic May 29, 2008 08:25 am
communism does not work because even in russia there was an upper class while they were commies

Posted by: Security Corporate May 29, 2008 11:08 am

The only reason why communism can never work is because people aren't perfect and can't understand what perfection means. Otherwise, it's a lovely form of government.

Posted by: Smachine May 29, 2008 02:26 pm
QUOTE (mallic @ May 29, 2008 08:25 am)
communism does not work because even in russia there was an upper class while they were commies

In every communist country's it is like that. Thats what is so great about it just gotta make it to the upper level. World where all people would be equal would be boring and stupid and there would be no point to live, we all seek to be superior, better, smarter, faster and so one, no matter if we admit or not.

Posted by: mallic May 30, 2008 06:34 am
which is exactly why it does not work

Posted by: Smachine May 30, 2008 09:27 am
QUOTE (mallic @ May 30, 2008 06:34 am)
which is exactly why it does not work

Most of my family have born and lived in communism and they all agree it works! cool.gif Just not the way it says to work.

Posted by: mallic May 30, 2008 04:18 pm
/me stabs smachine for his failing government choice. If you want social castes just do a monarchy. It is more truethful and works better.

Posted by: Security Corporate May 30, 2008 07:18 pm

My personal recipe for government is a combination of things.

Combine 1 cup of Democracy and 1 cup of Federalism. Add a dash of basic Socialism in there. An ounce of Republic may be added to spice things up.

Posted by: gordon_frohman June 03, 2008 12:00 am
If pro is the opposite of con, is progress the opposite of Congress?

Posted by: Elite viking June 03, 2008 06:13 pm
haha, that made me laugh Frohman biggrin.gif

Posted by: Smachine September 26, 2008 06:31 pm
Palin is lulz!
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=6hELjmWfVBU
lol, not blinking!
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=0rbsNOEhl5Y

Haha!

Posted by: gordon_frohman September 29, 2008 10:34 pm
hummm me thinks mcain might die in the middle of his term ,, mysteriously ways * points at palin*


then you get a president with nuclear launch codes that might attack once a month at a random target !



WE ARE ALL GUNNA DIE !!!!!

Posted by: iliketoblowzombieheadsoff September 30, 2008 01:08 am
McCain will probably be a George Bush repeat. Hear his voice. That's just the beginning.

I hate Palin because... she's so controversial. That's all. biggrin.gif

Posted by: Smachine September 30, 2008 02:12 pm
QUOTE (iliketoblowzombieheadsoff @ September 30, 2008 01:08 am)
McCain will probably be a George Bush repeat. Hear his voice. That's just the beginning.

I hate Palin because... she's so controversial. That's all. biggrin.gif

Or you meant conservative? :/

Posted by: mallic September 30, 2008 08:56 pm
I hope its obama just for the sake of having a fun ride so to speak.

Posted by: iliketoblowzombieheadsoff October 01, 2008 01:00 am
QUOTE (Smachine @ September 30, 2008 05:12 am)
QUOTE (iliketoblowzombieheadsoff @ September 30, 2008 01:08 am)
McCain will probably be a  George Bush repeat. Hear his voice. That's just the beginning.

I hate Palin because... she's so controversial. That's all. biggrin.gif

Or you meant conservative? :/

That too. Hahahahaha

All I can say is that, she seems very annoying. Weheheheehehe
You never know.

Posted by: Smachine October 01, 2008 01:16 pm
QUOTE (iliketoblowzombieheadsoff @ October 01, 2008 01:00 am)
QUOTE (Smachine @ September 30, 2008 05:12 am)
QUOTE (iliketoblowzombieheadsoff @ September 30, 2008 01:08 am)
McCain will probably be a  George Bush repeat. Hear his voice. That's just the beginning.

I hate Palin because... she's so controversial. That's all. biggrin.gif

Or you meant conservative? :/

That too. Hahahahaha

All I can say is that, she seems very annoying. Weheheheehehe
You never know.

I think shes relatively dumb, I mean not dumber than prolly the average people un US, but clearly way too dumb for something like a president or vice president job. And yeah, all the stupid conservative opinions about abortion, education system and climate change. ph34r.gif

Edit:
Nop, shes actually belove average :/
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=xRkWebP2Q0Y

Posted by: Nikku October 18, 2008 04:48 am
If Obama wins, He is gonna get shot.
Not that i agree with the shooting of him.

Posted by: Security Corporate October 18, 2008 08:06 am
QUOTE (Smachine @ October 01, 2008 05:16 am)
I think shes relatively dumb, I mean not dumber than prolly the average people un US

What a very tactless comment. Because "average" people everywhere else in the world are so much smarter. If that were true, then the United States shouldn't even be a first world country. However, that's not the case, is it?

Posted by: hunter October 18, 2008 11:00 am
QUOTE (Nikku @ October 18, 2008 03:48 am)
If Obama wins, He is gonna get shot.
Not that i agree with the shooting of him.

Martin L king all over again, i know what your saying white supremacists wont stand for it cunts.

Posted by: Smachine October 18, 2008 11:03 am
QUOTE (Security Corporate @ October 18, 2008 08:06 am)
QUOTE (Smachine @ October 01, 2008 05:16 am)
I think shes relatively dumb, I mean not dumber than prolly the average people un US

What a very tactless comment. Because "average" people everywhere else in the world are so much smarter. If that were true, then the United States shouldn't even be a first world country. However, that's not the case, is it?

People are dumb everywhere, the average people that is, but in any sane country those people don't get nominated for that to big government jobs, I mean how much intellect is needed to name a few news sources, especially if the question is repeated like 4 times.

Posted by: mallic October 18, 2008 01:38 pm
This whole election is a joke. It does not matter who is elected, as the same shit will keep happening. And personally I want obama elected because if mcain has a heart attack, palin will be the president and that woman is way to fucking stupid to run this country. Hell me and SC and a package of peanuts could run the country better than her.

All this pathetic media whore of an election is, is nothing but one big distraction to distract americans from the red white and blue dick being rammed up their asses by the corporations of the world. (semi quoting George Carlin (may he rest his soul) on that one). All the injustices will still go on no matter what promises the candidates make. Even if they try to keep their promises, it will be impossible for them to change much, because most of the government is bought and paid for by multi-billion dollar corporations.

In my opinion, we should all throw off all the corrupt sacks of shit we have running for our government. Hell I am sick of them doing next to nothing about our societies problems. Hell I can walk 80 feet from my house and see about 4 homeless people and about 70 people living in shitty ass housing. The quality of life here is absolutely bullshit. Our jail systems are retarded and most of the time do not work. We have schools that teach false history and that distort the bits of real history so much they create a mindless mass of people with no knowledge of anything outside their narrow walls of comfort that graduate thinking they are ready to take on the world, and then crash and burn and become homeless. All because our government would rather spend money on a fucking war that most people in the country do not support anymore. We did what we set out to do, get the fuck out and come home and spend money on alternative fuel sources and education.


there is more I could rant about but for now
/end rant

Posted by: Smachine October 19, 2008 08:45 am
I agree about all the stuff you wrote, but you seriously paint the whole situation too black, believe me there are many countrys that have a lot worse situation, I see like 10 money beggers every day in capital walking to university, pensions here are well belove the minimum wage which is declared by government and this minimum wage is really funny includes stuff like one pair of shes for a year and so one no medication or anything, you're old and sick? Have no money? Well you can just die.

Posted by: _CiviliaN^SoldieR_ October 19, 2008 11:01 am
QUOTE (Smachine @ October 18, 2008 10:03 am)
QUOTE (Security Corporate @ October 18, 2008 08:06 am)
QUOTE (Smachine @ October 01, 2008 05:16 am)
I think shes relatively dumb, I mean not dumber than prolly the average people un US

What a very tactless comment. Because "average" people everywhere else in the world are so much smarter. If that were true, then the United States shouldn't even be a first world country. However, that's not the case, is it?

People are dumb everywhere, the average people that is, but in any sane country those people don't get nominated for that to big government jobs, I mean how much intellect is needed to name a few news sources, especially if the question is repeated like 4 times.

Oh? Only people of higher supreme intelligence are nominated for a foot in the government? Hmm, my mistake then, I always thought the main qualities were arrogance, two-faced and able to read a script.

Posted by: Smachine October 19, 2008 03:07 pm
QUOTE (_CiviliaN^SoldieR_ @ October 19, 2008 11:01 am)
QUOTE (Smachine @ October 18, 2008 10:03 am)
QUOTE (Security Corporate @ October 18, 2008 08:06 am)
QUOTE (Smachine @ October 01, 2008 05:16 am)
I think shes relatively dumb, I mean not dumber than prolly the average people un US

What a very tactless comment. Because "average" people everywhere else in the world are so much smarter. If that were true, then the United States shouldn't even be a first world country. However, that's not the case, is it?

People are dumb everywhere, the average people that is, but in any sane country those people don't get nominated for that to big government jobs, I mean how much intellect is needed to name a few news sources, especially if the question is repeated like 4 times.

Oh? Only people of higher supreme intelligence are nominated for a foot in the government? Hmm, my mistake then, I always thought the main qualities were arrogance, two-faced and able to read a script.

Maybe not the best minds you could want but clearly they are not on stupidity scale of Sarah Palin. She is really dumb as rock. Also being smart doesnt make them work in favor of people that elected them.

Posted by: mrmicky October 19, 2008 04:00 pm
I like potatoes.

Posted by: Smachine October 19, 2008 04:21 pm
QUOTE (mrmicky @ October 19, 2008 04:00 pm)
I like potatoes.

Oh, how nice to hear than! wink.gif

Posted by: mallic October 19, 2008 05:06 pm
QUOTE (mrmicky @ October 19, 2008 04:00 pm)
I like potatoes.

as do I mate... as do I.

Posted by: hunter October 20, 2008 06:59 am
TATERS FOR PRESIDENT!

Posted by: mallic October 20, 2008 11:21 am
But then we would be electing a dead president !?!?!?

Posted by: iliketoblowzombieheadsoff October 21, 2008 01:15 am
Potatoes for president... sounds great!!!

Anyway, McCain will be another Bush, only a bit better, yeah? ohmy.gif

Posted by: Security Corporate October 21, 2008 03:21 am

Funny how a lot of people think McCain is just a copy of Bush. That makes absolutely no sense as the men are politically different (McCain is a real radical when compared to more mainstream Republicans) and also the fact that McCain would scoop old GWB's eyes out with a plastic spoon if given the chance (they're not friends).

McCain will not only run his office differently than Bush, he will probably run it better.

Posted by: Smachine October 21, 2008 01:58 pm
QUOTE (Security Corporate @ October 21, 2008 03:21 am)
Funny how a lot of people think McCain is just a copy of Bush. That makes absolutely no sense as the men are politically different (McCain is a real radical when compared to more mainstream Republicans) and also the fact that McCain would scoop old GWB's eyes out with a plastic spoon if given the chance (they're not friends).

McCain will not only run his office differently than Bush, he will probably run it better.

Yeah, hes the maverick!
Yeah, hes a really bright guy to pick a running mate with intellect not much bigger of a primary school kid, not to mention that hes voted the same as Bush like 90% times :/
Yeah, lets hunt down all the gays, abortionists, stemcell researchers, bear lovers and burn them like in old good christian way! cool.gif

Posted by: mallic October 21, 2008 09:29 pm
he is smart, however his running mate is as dumb as a potato (but potatoes taste better XD).

Posted by: iliketoblowzombieheadsoff October 22, 2008 02:27 am
QUOTE (Security Corporate @ October 20, 2008 06:21 pm)
Funny how a lot of people think McCain is just a copy of Bush. That makes absolutely no sense as the men are politically different (McCain is a real radical when compared to more mainstream Republicans) and also the fact that McCain would scoop old GWB's eyes out with a plastic spoon if given the chance (they're not friends).

McCain will not only run his office differently than Bush, he will probably run it better.

Hmmm, yeah I haven't gotten into deep detail with McCain really, I'm not so into politics but my school is making me get into it(argh you history class).

So, does that make Bush a republican? Or is he just running this continent with Republican things but claims himself as a democrat? An answer I don't know. tongue.gif

Posted by: Security Corporate October 22, 2008 08:23 am
QUOTE (Smachine @ October 21, 2008 05:58 am)
QUOTE (Security Corporate @ October 21, 2008 03:21 am)
Funny how a lot of people think McCain is just a copy of Bush. That makes absolutely no sense as the men are politically different (McCain is a real radical when compared to more mainstream Republicans) and also the fact that McCain would scoop old GWB's eyes out with a plastic spoon if given the chance (they're not friends).

McCain will not only run his office differently than Bush, he will probably run it better.

Yeah, hes the maverick!
Yeah, hes a really bright guy to pick a running mate with intellect not much bigger of a primary school kid, not to mention that hes voted the same as Bush like 90% times :/
Yeah, lets hunt down all the gays, abortionists, stemcell researchers, bear lovers and burn them like in old good christian way! cool.gif

Before you start acting anymore sarcastic, I want to say that I wasn't in any way trying to "sell" McCain as the best presidential candidate ever. I was simply saying how he was different (and better) from Bush. His political alignment with him was temporary and awkward, and he only did it to gain sufficient support to run for office successfully. It's called political tactics darling, get used to it. wink.gif

As for the issues, which you heavily exxaggerated, are not extreme right-wing. They're actually closer to moderate viewpoints than anything else.

Social change takes time Smachine, and whether pessiments want to admit it or not, things really are progressing.

Posted by: mallic October 22, 2008 01:43 pm
Tell that to stock brokers


btw its pessimists

Posted by: Smachine October 22, 2008 04:28 pm
QUOTE (Security Corporate @ October 22, 2008 08:23 am)
QUOTE (Smachine @ October 21, 2008 05:58 am)
QUOTE (Security Corporate @ October 21, 2008 03:21 am)
Funny how a lot of people think McCain is just a copy of Bush. That makes absolutely no sense as the men are politically different (McCain is a real radical when compared to more mainstream Republicans) and also the fact that McCain would scoop old GWB's eyes out with a plastic spoon if given the chance (they're not friends).

McCain will not only run his office differently than Bush, he will probably run it better.

Yeah, hes the maverick!
Yeah, hes a really bright guy to pick a running mate with intellect not much bigger of a primary school kid, not to mention that hes voted the same as Bush like 90% times :/
Yeah, lets hunt down all the gays, abortionists, stemcell researchers, bear lovers and burn them like in old good christian way! cool.gif

Before you start acting anymore sarcastic, I want to say that I wasn't in any way trying to "sell" McCain as the best presidential candidate ever. I was simply saying how he was different (and better) from Bush. His political alignment with him was temporary and awkward, and he only did it to gain sufficient support to run for office successfully. It's called political tactics darling, get used to it. wink.gif

As for the issues, which you heavily exxaggerated, are not extreme right-wing. They're actually closer to moderate viewpoints than anything else.

Social change takes time Smachine, and whether pessiments want to admit it or not, things really are progressing.

Good to hear that, you almost started to sound like jesus camp kid. But you cannot believe a guy to be really putting the country first if he picks the dumbest possible running mate only to appeal certain crowds of people.

Posted by: mallic October 23, 2008 03:06 pm
Social changes most likely will not occur, due to the large populous of ignorant morons in this country. Seventy-five percent of the mexican population wants to allow illegal immigration and bitches when I say fuck you come in legally or not at all. They bitch when you try to do something, yet they do not look at the economic impact that illegal immigrants have. Yes, they provide cheap labor which is good for an owner of a company, but bad for the rest of americans. Hiring immigrants makes it harder for americans to get certain jobs, because the pricks who run the company will just fire any non-illegal who questions the way the owner runs the country and will hire an illegal at low cost. Also, they sap resources in the forms of our jails, identity theft/social security scams. I am not saying ALL the illegal immigrants do this, however there are a good portion of them that do.

Another sign of the populace's pure ignorance and willful pacification and willingness to be enslaved would be our voting quota. As you all know (or should), the USA is a democratic republic. This means that for the most part, if enough people vote things will be done. This is a great system when people vote and voice their opinions and lobby to get their opinions heard. But there in lies the problem, as most people do not vote yet they ceaselessly complain about how they are getting fucked by the system. I am barely 17 and I follow the debates/news and have more of a political interest than 80% of this country. Tell me this please: how can you bitch when you have done absolutely nothing to better your standard of living? How can you complain about that which could have been completely and utterly avoided if you had just gotten off your fat lazy ass and spent a day voting. You can't even complain that you will get fired for doing so, as it is illegal to fire someone for voting or jury duty.

Posted by: gordon_frohman October 23, 2008 03:45 pm
BARACK OBAMA FOR PRESIDENT !


laugh.gif tongue.gif ph34r.gif

Posted by: Security Corporate October 24, 2008 12:29 am
QUOTE (gordon_frohman @ October 23, 2008 07:45 am)
BARACK OBAMA FOR PRESIDENT !


laugh.gif tongue.gif ph34r.gif

Things are running REAL close. Obama and McCain about as dead even as candidate popularity can get. Let's just shed the reality of the candidates themselves for a second. You know guys, either way, we'll either get a black president, or a female vice president. It's some sort of change either way. Would it be too extreme to call this another turning point in American history?

We're living it! Yeah? Yeah?!??!

Posted by: _CiviliaN^SoldieR_ October 24, 2008 09:26 am
Obama for presient.

Posted by: Smachine October 26, 2008 05:01 pm
Well McCain is really stupid too, like real dumb, actually thats prolly on the stupidity level of Palin. :/ I cant believe how I didn't saw this earlier.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=E5ENwej0fpc

Posted by: hunter October 26, 2008 05:32 pm
QUOTE (Smachine @ October 26, 2008 04:01 pm)
Well McCain is really stupid too, like real dumb, actually thats prolly on the stupidity level of Palin. :/ I cant believe how I didn't saw this earlier.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=E5ENwej0fpc

Must be his old age!

Posted by: Smachine October 26, 2008 06:48 pm
QUOTE (hunter @ October 26, 2008 05:32 pm)
QUOTE (Smachine @ October 26, 2008 04:01 pm)
Well McCain is really stupid too, like real dumb, actually thats prolly on the stupidity level of Palin. :/ I cant believe how I didn't saw this earlier.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=E5ENwej0fpc

Must be his old age!

You want a president like that? Old enough to forget such a common known things.

Posted by: Security Corporate October 26, 2008 07:53 pm
QUOTE
If you dislike compaign oratory, put yourself in the candidate's shoes for a moment. Every word you say will be scrutinized, especially for slips of the tongue. Interest group leaders and party activists will react sharply to any phrase that departs from their preferred policies. Your opponent stands ready to pounce on any error of fact or judgment. You must give countless speeches every day.

People will make mistakes, no one is going to be perfect. For people to think every candidate must be a divine creation of God that will be above the mistakes of man is laughable. Extremely laughable.

QUOTE (Smachine)
Well McCain is really stupid too, like real dumb, actually thats prolly on the stupidity level of Palin.

I'd like to see you run for an office. With your 10 year old level analysis of every political situation, you might be lucky to even have your name mentioned in the first primary.

I will not tolerate blind accusations of either McCain, Obama, or any other candidate for that matter. Polititians will have their strengths and weaknesses, and sure, criticize them all you want, but if you want to go so low as to call any of them "stupid" or "real dumb" you may want to look at yourself in the mirror and reevaluate your own intelligence.

Posted by: Smachine October 26, 2008 08:32 pm
Well McCain advocates that he "knows" foreign Policy, and is a lot more into it than Obama, but this is real stupid, I mean mistake is when you dont know who is the president of Malta or something (while imo if you run for president in US you prolly should know), but mistaking Putin as president of Germany and not correcting/noticing the mistake like a second afterwards is just wow, thats amazing dumb. What can you know about foreign policy if you dont know how runs Germany and who Russia, its just amazing! And you can not tolerate this as much as you want really wink.gif I think your the one to use 10 years old analysis if you think this is the level of intelligence thats ok for a president. You seem to not realise that in US candidates are picked to obey certain sponsors wishes and appeal certain crowds of people, like Palin appeals the conservative hockey moms and other idiots.

Posted by: Chairman Wesker October 26, 2008 11:18 pm
ZOMBIE JESUS '08

user posted image

Sorry seen this image when looking for zombies and had to post it.

Posted by: Security Corporate October 27, 2008 03:57 am
QUOTE (Smachine @ October 26, 2008 12:32 pm)
You seem to not realise that in US candidates are picked to obey certain sponsors wishes and appeal certain crowds of people, like Palin appeals the conservative hockey moms and other idiots.

And again, that's what you call political strategy. That's how it's been done, that's how it will always be done. You're too much of an idealist to realize that's not going to change any time soon. You seem to have your own idea on how politics in America works. You think it's supposed to run your way, but it does not. Try dealing with the system that you have now, not with your own version of it.

You cannot judge McCain's intelligence by a single mistake, no matter how bad it was. I'd say that's pretty damn good thing if that youtube video is the only proof showing a slip from McCain. You'd actually have a case if he made more mistakes of the same kind, but he hasn't has he? It's not right to base his entire intellect soley on one mishap. I don't think you'd be very happy if someone called you a crappy modeler because one of your models turned out to be a disaster. wink.gif

Posted by: mallic October 27, 2008 01:22 pm
It does not matter who is elected really. Both candidates are running as center-ists instead of sticking to their right or left wing political views.

Posted by: Smachine October 27, 2008 04:34 pm
QUOTE (Security Corporate @ October 27, 2008 03:57 am)
QUOTE (Smachine @ October 26, 2008 12:32 pm)
You seem to not realise that in US candidates are picked to obey certain sponsors wishes and appeal certain crowds of people, like Palin appeals the conservative hockey moms and other idiots.

And again, that's what you call political strategy. That's how it's been done, that's how it will always be done. You're too much of an idealist to realize that's not going to change any time soon. You seem to have your own idea on how politics in America works. You think it's supposed to run your way, but it does not. Try dealing with the system that you have now, not with your own version of it.

You cannot judge McCain's intelligence by a single mistake, no matter how bad it was. I'd say that's pretty damn good thing if that youtube video is the only proof showing a slip from McCain. You'd actually have a case if he made more mistakes of the same kind, but he hasn't has he? It's not right to base his entire intellect soley on one mishap. I don't think you'd be very happy if someone called you a crappy modeler because one of your models turned out to be a disaster. wink.gif

Im not saying that this will ever change much, all im saying is Republican party is taking the pick someone the majority thinks is "real american" too far and doesnt even bother with the fact that the person is totally dumb. I support Obama, Im not american you know, so I dont really feel any difference where in whoever wins, I just think hes a bright guy and someone who is good enough to be president of such a big country. Btw, Russian propogandic media uses that "mistake" regulary to mock US...

And yeah, amazing
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/uselectionroadtrip/2008/oct/27/barack-obama-muslim-antichrist

Posted by: Security Corporate October 28, 2008 06:16 am
QUOTE (Smachine @ October 27, 2008 08:34 am)
Btw, Russian propogandic media uses that "mistake" regulary to mock US...

Bah, that matters not. Just shows they're still rather pissed that they're not a superpower anymore. They may even be jealous because they were outlasted by a country which has its streak of "dumb" presidents. RIP USSR.

Anyway, the election is very close. It's so close, I'm willing to bet some people will be forced to flip a coin when they're voting. This is the first presidential election I'm actually looking foward to.

Posted by: _CiviliaN^SoldieR_ October 28, 2008 11:03 am
Obama for president because he's black! Will mindfuck all the stupid racist scum out there.

Posted by: mallic October 28, 2008 12:51 pm
Yesterday police broke up an assassination plot on obama by two skinheads.

Posted by: gordon_frohman October 28, 2008 07:08 pm
QUOTE (mallic @ October 28, 2008 12:51 pm)
Yesterday police broke up an assassination plot on obama by two skinheads.

3 skinheads

Posted by: mallic October 28, 2008 08:44 pm
Odd my news station said it was two skin heads.

Posted by: Smachine October 28, 2008 08:56 pm
QUOTE (mallic @ October 28, 2008 08:44 pm)
Odd my news station said it was two skin heads.

Same with me! happy.gif

Posted by: mallic October 28, 2008 09:21 pm
Damn he hasn't even gotten his foot in the door and they are trying to kill him >_<

Also, this election does not matter. They are using it to distract you from the insane propositions that are going to be passed. There is a actually a proposition to combine church and state which is most likely going to make christians over turn our way of life with their idiotic, repressive, bigoted view of the world. There is a proposition about gay marraige, combining all school funds (which will make crappier schools), one that will make every single non-voter count as a no vote (this would completely end any new laws from being passed, because only like 30% of the population votes), and there are many new propositions that are fucking stupid and serve only to enforce the will of certain group's individual propoganda and to control the masses into an effective group of zombies with only the skills to perform manual labor and not question the oppresive hand that guides.

This is absolutely bullshit and in the words of Jefferson, we ought to revolt and restore the fear of the people into the government. This is a democrasy, yet it is plauged with people that push their views on us and twist us into their mindless slaves. We are bombarded by the media, which is controlled by the governement, to be oppressive, judgemental, prejudiced, violent, ignorant, tools that are good for nothing other then to make money for those in power. Few own the reigns to this country, and those few could care less about you. So go ahead talk about the election and ignore the important things.

Me, I will stick to focussing on propositions and senetors, the real movers and shakers in the politcal mind game. I only wish I were old enough to legally vote and hold protests. This system needs radical changes. Those in power should face retrubution for their greed and lust!

Posted by: Security Corporate October 29, 2008 06:06 am
QUOTE (mallic @ October 28, 2008 01:21 pm)
Damn he hasn't even gotten his foot in the door and they are trying to kill him >_<

Also, this election does not matter. They are using it to distract you from the insane propositions that are going to be passed. There is a actually a proposition to combine church and state  which is most likely going to make christians over turn our way of life with their idiotic, repressive, bigoted view of the world. There is a proposition about gay marraige, combining all school funds (which will make crappier schools), one that will make every single non-voter count as a no vote (this would completely end any new laws from being passed, because only like 30% of the population votes), and there are many new propositions that are fucking stupid and serve only to enforce the will of certain group's individual propoganda and to control the masses into an effective group of zombies with only the skills to perform manual labor and not question the oppresive hand that guides.

This is absolutely bullshit and in the words of Jefferson, we ought to revolt and restore the fear of the people into the government. This is a democrasy, yet it is plauged with people that push their views on us and twist us into their mindless slaves. We are bombarded by the media, which is controlled by the governement, to be oppressive, judgemental, prejudiced, violent, ignorant, tools that are good for nothing other then to make money for those in power. Few own the reigns to this country, and those few could care less about you. So go ahead talk about the election and ignore the important things.

Me, I will stick to focussing on propositions and senetors, the real movers and shakers in the politcal mind game. I only wish I were old enough to legally vote and hold protests. This system needs radical changes. Those in power should face retrubution for their greed and lust!

The Communist Party approves of the above message.



tongue.gif

Hehe, I can't wait to wear my bright red Soviet shirt to school one of these days.

Anyway, there's also a proposition keeping marriage between a man and a woman only. Also, as farfetched and unrealistic it may seem, I really think the president should be directly elected. I don't care how difficult it would be to manage it, but at least the popular vote would fucking count for something. In other news, I'll be turning 18 in a few months. Now I can be "officially" politically active.

Posted by: mallic October 29, 2008 06:33 am
By a proposition about gay marriage I meant the one that made it illegal >_>


AND I get to drag you to the SCA to get your lazy ass to fight and kick some ass XD

Posted by: Security Corporate October 29, 2008 07:21 am
QUOTE (mallic @ October 28, 2008 10:33 pm)
By a proposition about gay marriage I meant the one that made it illegal >_>


AND I get to drag you to the SCA to get your lazy ass to fight and kick some ass XD

Oh, I missed that one. X.x

Yes I read. FBI busted some neo-nazis. Here's my demented interpretation of their kind; Hitler committed suicide, so every neo-nazi is most likely secretly emo. It will not be long until they devolve into emo-nazi's!

Biden was right. If Obama gets elected, the first 6 months of his tenure is going to be HELL.

Posted by: mallic October 29, 2008 10:15 am
I feel sorry for the secret service. This is the hardest they are ever going to have to work.

Posted by: Security Corporate November 05, 2008 05:35 am

Obama has won... ohmy.gif

Posted by: gordon_frohman November 05, 2008 07:55 am
QUOTE (Security Corporate @ November 05, 2008 05:35 am)
Obama has won... ohmy.gif

amidst the biggest head pain ever this morning that actually perked my day up slightly.


i expect some assassination attempts in the future from closet-KKK'ers

Posted by: Smachine November 05, 2008 01:35 pm
QUOTE (Security Corporate @ November 05, 2008 05:35 am)
Obama has won... ohmy.gif

Good!

Posted by: Elite viking November 05, 2008 04:26 pm
Jubilations! While it's difficult to imagine America changing course overnight, this is definately a good start.

Posted by: _CiviliaN^SoldieR_ November 06, 2008 05:23 pm
Yay! I'm glad Obama is president and I look forward to the results. I'm British and this is the only American presidential vote I was bothered about.

Posted by: Security Corporate November 07, 2008 01:19 am

My Republican blood burns! Argh...

Anyway, McCain truly is a man of honor. He gave the best concession speech I've heard. I mean really, he's the first politician I've head to say "It's my fault". He didn't blame anything or anyone for losing. He just took it like a man.

He'd be an excellent Secretary of Defense though. He used to be a Naval officer, so if anyone can connect with the troops, it's him. I wonder if Obama will offer him a position in the White House. McCain probably won't accept if he did, but still. The gesture is good.

Posted by: Smachine November 07, 2008 01:42 pm
QUOTE (Security Corporate @ November 07, 2008 01:19 am)
My Republican blood burns! Argh...

I always taught you where some christian fundamentalist.

Posted by: mallic November 07, 2008 02:18 pm
Blarg he could still get assassinated before is inauguration. Sadly there are a lot of racists out there and I bet they are already making a master plan to kill him.

For the record, I fully support obama as our first black president. No one can ever use the term "it's because I am black". Although we will have to change all the plants at the whitehouse into watermellons

Posted by: gordon_frohman November 07, 2008 04:51 pm
and build a chicken coop in the back-yard

Posted by: Security Corporate November 08, 2008 12:41 am
QUOTE (Smachine @ November 07, 2008 05:42 am)
QUOTE (Security Corporate @ November 07, 2008 01:19 am)
My Republican blood burns! Argh...

I always taught you where some christian fundamentalist.

I always thought you were some anarchistic hippy.

Posted by: Smachine November 08, 2008 11:32 am
QUOTE (Security Corporate @ November 08, 2008 12:41 am)
QUOTE (Smachine @ November 07, 2008 05:42 am)
QUOTE (Security Corporate @ November 07, 2008 01:19 am)
My Republican blood burns! Argh...

I always taught you where some christian fundamentalist.

I always thought you were some anarchistic hippy.

Nah, Im not in favor of peace and I like tight government control as long as it makes things better.

Posted by: Security Corporate November 08, 2008 09:00 pm
QUOTE (Smachine @ November 08, 2008 03:32 am)
QUOTE (Security Corporate @ November 08, 2008 12:41 am)
QUOTE (Smachine @ November 07, 2008 05:42 am)
QUOTE (Security Corporate @ November 07, 2008 01:19 am)
My Republican blood burns! Argh...

I always taught you where some christian fundamentalist.

I always thought you were some anarchistic hippy.

Nah, Im not in favor of peace and I like tight government control as long as it makes things better.

Alright. See how assuming works? Making blind assumptions such as "Christian Fundamentalist" just makes you look like a little silly goose. You really need to work on your people skills.

Posted by: Smachine November 08, 2008 10:03 pm
But the base of Republican party's suppoters are religious conservatives, so my assumption is fully supported by logic.

Posted by: Security Corporate November 09, 2008 08:57 am
QUOTE (Smachine @ November 08, 2008 02:03 pm)
But the base of Republican party's suppoters are religious conservatives, so my assumption is fully supported by logic.

No need to explain Smachine, I accept your apology. happy.gif

Also, if there's any classification I must take, it would be "Republican moderate".

Posted by: Smachine November 09, 2008 07:19 pm
But you gotta admit, Obama rocks!
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/WireStory?id=6215451&page=1

Posted by: mallic February 07, 2010 03:27 pm
Back on topic, a trite meaningless victory for Obama it has been. Thwarted by adversaries that abound in every direction.

Posted by: DavidRoxZoRs February 25, 2010 10:33 pm
Glenn Beck.
Michael Savage.
Bill O'Reilly.
John McCain.
Jim Kerry.
George Washington.
George W. Bush.
George H. W. Bush.
Your Mom.


All of these relate to politics smile.gif

Posted by: mallic February 27, 2010 12:18 am
Nah, my mom's a slag.

Posted by: gordon_frohman March 01, 2010 11:56 am
QUOTE (mallic @ February 27, 2010 12:18 am)
Nah, my mom's a slag.

slag = another word for someone loose ? tongue.gif

Posted by: Keyes March 01, 2010 03:06 pm
QUOTE (gordon_frohman @ March 01, 2010 11:56 am)
QUOTE (mallic @ February 27, 2010 12:18 am)
Nah, my mom's a slag.

slag = another word for someone loose ? tongue.gif

Correct, though I was under the impression that it was predominantly used by the British.

Also, it is the waste material from smelting iron or steel.

Posted by: mallic March 01, 2010 06:35 pm
It is primarily used by brits. However I have a shit ton of friends from Manchester

Posted by: gordon_frohman March 02, 2010 12:59 am
let brittish english take over the world!

Posted by: Shoot_me March 02, 2010 06:36 am
So... is it TRUNK or BOOT? Elevator or lift.... or... ... . arg. ... I'd be lost...

On a political note, erm, question... for those of you outside the USA, has Obama helped or hurt our image around the world? ph34r.gif

Posted by: iliketoblowzombieheadsoff March 02, 2010 07:42 am
All I'd like to say about politics: I hate conservatives.

Attack me all you want, it seems to fit what's going on with the States right now.

Goddang, and I just typed 4 papers about government......

I'm not much into politics but it's about time for me to post something here...

Posted by: Shoot_me March 03, 2010 07:49 am
QUOTE (iliketoblowzombieheadsoff @ March 02, 2010 01:42 am)
All I'd like to say about politics: I hate conservatives.

Attack me all you want, it seems to fit what's going on with the States right now.

Goddang, and I just typed 4 papers about government......

I'm not much into politics but it's about time for me to post something here...

I R hated. sad.gif

Posted by: iliketoblowzombieheadsoff March 04, 2010 02:48 am
Oh, I forgot... there are also GOOD conservatives. Not that I've ever seen one so... sorry Shoot_Me.

Posted by: hunter March 04, 2010 06:46 pm
Ughhh polotics bores me to death, deathly shit, anyway chips over fries faggots

Posted by: iliketoblowzombieheadsoff March 05, 2010 01:18 am
I agree, but I would say the above if I were to talk about it....

Posted by: Shoot_me March 06, 2010 10:08 am
QUOTE (iliketoblowzombieheadsoff @ March 03, 2010 08:48 pm)
Oh, I forgot... there are also GOOD conservatives. Not that I've ever seen one so... sorry Shoot_Me.

So, I've gone from hated to just being bad... eh. tongue.gif Better than being evil I guess.


Now.... where is my burger and fries!!! laugh.gif

Posted by: _CiviliaN^SoldieR_ March 06, 2010 05:38 pm
QUOTE (Shoot_me @ March 02, 2010 05:36 am)
So... is it TRUNK or BOOT? Elevator or lift.... or... ... . arg. ... I'd be lost...

On a political note, erm, question... for those of you outside the USA, has Obama helped or hurt our image around the world? ph34r.gif

Personally, I think it has improved the image of USA. There's just something very honest about Obama and he seems real.

Posted by: mallic March 08, 2010 08:29 pm
I hope it turns out that he eats babies or something. That would be funny.

Posted by: Shoot_me March 10, 2010 07:50 am
QUOTE (mallic @ March 08, 2010 02:29 pm)
I hope it turns out that he eats babies or something. That would be funny.

... You say (post) that and... just wait... somehow FOX or CNN will start running that headline while the rest of our alphabet-soup cable news channels try and make such a thing look normal... ph34r.gif


_CiviliaN^SoldieR_: Huh. From the media coverage I've been seeing, you'd think Obama's image was going in the opposite direction. Then again, Obama has been having a hard time with some of the changes he's been trying to make and the media (from what I've been watching) has been (attempting to, at least) making him look like a used car salesman.

Powered by Invision Power Board (http://www.invisionboard.com)
© Invision Power Services (http://www.invisionpower.com)
LiteBar skin by InvisionSkins.com - copyright 2003 Goof Muilwijk [Roadkill71]