Important suggestion

"1) You are encouraging some players to go zombie in order to disrupt the other team."

yeah? so? lol, another strategy for competition.

"2) Location of quests will have a large amount in deteriming the winner, whoever gets the closer case or the killing blow on Fred gains an extreme advantage."

team maps could be designed so they are a mirror of each other, and the chest spawn spots could be in equal places at all times. example:
(s is player spawn, c is case spawn)

s--------c
|..\........| okay so its rough, but thats 3 different pathways to each others
|.....c.....| spawn, and in the middle of each is a case spawn.
|........\..| (periods are empty space. doesnt let me add extra spaces.)
c--------s also, fred and some other sort of big zombie, 1 for each team (the
other team obviously unable to dmg the competing teams fred.)

"3) You are encouraging other survivors to block doors and block shots on Fred."
with 2 freds, this would be less of a problem. and the blocking doors can be stopped with either mapping, or the use of going zombie to hinder the other team (kill the door blocker)

"- There is no need for 30 seconds of waiting while the game annouces awards. This can (and should) be done with a meta mod plugin in about 5-10 seconds."

I don't know, that idea is rough. I just want to see some way of acknowledging player achievements in PUBLIC games (clan/group set up games this obvious has never been a problem)

"- There are already 10 instances of additional zombie methods of attack in this forum, so I doubt that will work."

dont quite understand what you mean.

"- Adding the above will still not mak people care about what happened in the round. If people who play TFC and DoD do not care, what makes you think that the average BB player will care about the round statistics and ourcome if this ever gets implemented?"

im not saying that everyone will, just use the end game sequence to encourage a greater percentage of people to care about teamplay and strategy.

"- If there is a level 80+ on one team and he is the only high level (or possible more high levels on his team...), then the game will be no fun for anyone as that one person rampages around and wins the whole thing on his own."

already thought of that. In team games, have the option for everyone to level as a team. (or just average everyones level to choose amount of skill points they all get.)

of course, this would lead to team unbalancing, but then you could just set everyone (everyone on the server)'s skill points to the same amount to allocate as they please, if you desire a perfectly balanced team-play game.



Again, correct all my mistakes (but remember to be reasonable.)
I GREATLY APPRECIATE THE CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICSM.

Not really, BB stresses to try and NOT become a zombie...

Without an overhaul of game code, you can not say who spawns where, who can pick up what and who can shoot who. So you can not block with doors and/or walls.

The subject of giving zombies additional attacks has been brought up 10 different times, and every single time has been denied.

A greater percentage? Like the 5% (or less) we have currently up to 10% (most likely less)?

Half the point of BB is being able to level up. Why would I want to play a map (or server for that matter) that forced me down to level 10 when I played for a few days to get myself up to level 60?

Leave absolute equality to clan matches. Besides they already have rules for such events which work much, much better than this...