IronOak studios forums -> The Inevitable 'Gay Marriage' Topic

	[ Resend Validation Email ]
	Welcome Guest [ Log In · Register ]

IronOak studios forums + GENERAL PUBLIC DISCUSSION FOR ALL IRONOAK GAMES + Offtopic / Freiwild

Pages: ««<23456 [ Go to first unread post ]

[ Track this topic · Email this topic · Print this topic ]

The Inevitable 'Gay Marriage' Topic, Don't Close Topic

Smachine

Posted: March 02, 2008 10:53 am

Last hope of Mankind

Group: Old BB:S team
Posts: 665

Joined: June 24, 2007

QUOTE (Nikku @ March 01, 2008 08:11 pm)

QUOTE (-=Chris Redfield=- @ February 27, 2008 10:18 pm)

However, by definition, marriage was a contract in which the wife was the man's legal property, marriage used to only be between two people of the same race, and so on. Original doesn't always mean better.

EDIT: And just to add, people are fucking like rabbits as it is, so you don't have to worry about the baby issue. And two women "can" conceive a baby...they just need the sperm from a friend.

Actually, One woman her self can conceive a baby by undergoing a sietific process without any semen/sperm. The catch is that she can only make females. When this was first discovered, there was a sci fi book written about it. But it is true that a woman can have a girl, without a man's penis

Got more info on it? Trough yeah, as females only have XX chromosome's and they need Y one for a male. Tanker, yeah the same thing what I think, laws should be completely godfree. And about slavery, does it matter if it was 2000 or 4000 or what ever years ago, its still bad thing no matter when, if that was what the few last posts where about.

This post has been edited by Smachine on March 02, 2008 10:55 am

--------------------

Reality is for those who lack imagination!

Nikku

Posted: March 02, 2008 05:36 pm

Mr. Coke

Group: Old BB:S Betatesters
Posts: 3114

Joined: December 12, 2004

Did you guys one that a high percentage, around 90 percent of homophobes are flaming cock lovers?

Also, post your view is simple term for everyone to see.

(Yay, or Nay)

Yay, what ever floats your boat.

QUOTE

Got more info on it? Trough yeah, as females only have XX chromosome's and they need Y one for a male.

Yeah, women + women = girl.
There was an article posted about it.

This post has been edited by Nikku on March 02, 2008 05:38 pm

--------------------

Only when you gick, will you truly fish...

SDWBOSS	Posted: March 02, 2008 05:50 pm
Elite zombie Butcher Group: Old BB:S Betatesters Posts: 1407 Joined: June 30, 2006	I assume that doing this preocedure with male DNA in a "blank" egg cell could result in either boys or girls? --------------------

Nikku	Posted: March 02, 2008 07:16 pm
Mr. Coke Group: Old BB:S Betatesters Posts: 3114 Joined: December 12, 2004	No, becuase the women's cromozones are only X's, so the baby will have one X from the egg and another from the picked cell. They can do it with a man and a women, and then i think its a boy or a girl. Women egg +Women cell = (always) a girl Women egg + man cell = Boy/girl -------------------- Only when you gick, will you truly fish...

Smachine	Posted: March 02, 2008 08:45 pm
Last hope of Mankind Group: Old BB:S team Posts: 665 Joined: June 24, 2007	Yeah as females only have XX sex chromosomes dividing in meiosis always gives egg cell with x chromosome, but males have XY complect so its 50/50 that the gamete will be X or Y. SDWBOSS, not quit sure what you meant trough. -------------------- Reality is for those who lack imagination!

SDWBOSS

Posted: March 02, 2008 11:56 pm

Elite zombie Butcher

Group: Old BB:S Betatesters
Posts: 1407

Joined: June 30, 2006

QUOTE (Smachine @ March 02, 2008 08:45 pm)

Yeah as females only have XX sex chromosomes dividing in meiosis always gives egg cell with x chromosome, but males have XY complect so its 50/50 that the gamete will be X or Y. SDWBOSS, not quit sure what you meant trough.

HMmm I may have misunderstood this - you need a woman invlolved so for two men this would be impossible?

--------------------

Nikku

Posted: March 03, 2008 03:02 am

Mr. Coke

Group: Old BB:S Betatesters
Posts: 3114

Joined: December 12, 2004

QUOTE (SDWBOSS @ March 02, 2008 11:56 pm)

QUOTE (Smachine @ March 02, 2008 08:45 pm)

HMmm I may have misunderstood this - you need a woman invlolved so for two men this would be impossible?

AS of now, they are working on that. But you will always need an egg, but what they will do is "reprogram" man 1's genes in to the egg and erase the womens, and add man 2's genes and i think it must still gestate inside a woman's womb

--------------------

Only when you gick, will you truly fish...

bacon333	Posted: March 03, 2008 05:27 am
Elite zombie Butcher Group: Old BB:S team Posts: 1507 Joined: September 15, 2006	Anyway, it's all still very un-natural and ridiculously stupid.

Smachine

Posted: March 03, 2008 06:26 am

Last hope of Mankind

Group: Old BB:S team
Posts: 665

Joined: June 24, 2007

QUOTE (bacon333 @ March 03, 2008 05:27 am)

Anyway, it's all still very un-natural and ridiculously stupid.

Why, trough I still would like to see the link to an actual article, for best from a trustable site.

--------------------

Reality is for those who lack imagination!

Elite viking	Posted: March 03, 2008 11:43 am
Veteran Lord Carnage Group: Old BB:S Betatesters Posts: 2471 Joined: December 16, 2004	I haven't seen anything on it that I can remember, but theoretically it's completely plausible. Just had about cells in school, so I actually know what everyone talks about XD Gotta love science...

Luciel

Posted: March 03, 2008 12:22 pm

Doom Trooper

Group: Moderators
Posts: 1070

Joined: August 18, 2005

QUOTE (-=Chris Redfield=- @ March 01, 2008 04:19 am)

QUOTE (Smachine @ February 29, 2008 01:07 pm)

It doesn't matter how those different religious organizations interpret the "holy" books, as in all of the three abrahamic religions its clearly said by the god that gay is bad and they need to be stoned to death or something. And of course changing that damages the core of those religions, but I dunno I see religion itself as a damaged worldview.

It depends. The Old Testament, there are serious repracutions for being gay (after-life and the real life), and since Christians and Jews alike stay by that book (or atleast SHOULD), homosexuality is "icky" and bad. So yes, those three religions preach hate against anything that's not like them.

What a lot of you guys are doing though, is using the Catholics as the model for all Christians, which isn't quite the same ting. I mean, Southern Baptists are bad, but not for the same reasons as Roman Catholics.

Yes but you should also have in mind that most holy books represent sex as an awfull thing that you should do once or twice in your life to procreate...

bacon333	Posted: March 03, 2008 01:40 pm
Elite zombie Butcher Group: Old BB:S team Posts: 1507 Joined: September 15, 2006	That does in-directly keep over-population down

SDWBOSS

Posted: March 03, 2008 03:06 pm

Elite zombie Butcher

Group: Old BB:S Betatesters
Posts: 1407

Joined: June 30, 2006

QUOTE (bacon333 @ March 03, 2008 01:40 pm)

That does in-directly keep over-population down

Ok, Bacon, we should all try to follow your shining example and have sex twice over 50 years, while not enjoying a moment of it and DEFINATELY no smiling!!!.
Don't use them both up at once, or you'll really start to "bulge" in a few weeks o.O

Didn't God say to Adam and Eve "go forth and multiply"? That was part of the punishment from eating the "forbidden fruit"; They now had the urge to reproduce. I'd say that is a hell of a punishment to hand out ^^

--------------------