Why, why, why?, Admins wanna jump in here?

Unfortunately what you fail to realize is that slappy and i are actually in agreement. Not so much as to the intricacies of PvP, but the "unfinished" quality of the game in its entirety.

You will note, he clearly details that there are parts in the mod that are contradictory to themselves and that there are many features that still need refining, thus your claim that PvP is included due to intention is loosely based on your blatant disregard for the mod's release time. If this mod had been released for 2+ years and was going on version 3.0+, I could understand that a feature still left in, is a feature intended to be left in. HOWEVER this mod is barely past version 1.2, THUS it means that there is still much refinement to be done, including the details of PvP. Thus you cannot claim, just because it remains in the mod that it is sanctioned by the mod makers, for, most likely, it is rather bug/unintended feature.
Thus I remain adament on the fact that PvP, given the early development stages of this mod, is no longer an intended feature (it may have been in early stages, but the play of the game reveals that it is not intended) of the mod, and is most likely going to be completely revamped in the next coming patch.

This post has been edited by |2enegade on June 03, 2005 05:07 am

If I have "tested" your patience, let me report its results... it FAILS. Infinite blindness on your part has restricted you from noticing past posts made by the devs, abbeting my theory (slappy, TSS, and others in the past).

Perhaps if you actually tried to use proper debating skills and justifiable arguemenst instead of childish retorts, you may stand to pose a chance of tickling my intrigue.

Proof that this MOD was intended to go in both directions depending on the server. You were saying?

This post has been edited by Security Corporate on June 13, 2005 10:12 pm

Yo, you wanna lay off Renegade? In this forum we don't slag people off with an opinion; just because we have a different view to him and debating this doesn't mean we shouldn't treat him normally.

As I was saying...

Is undeniably correct, for it explains percisly why he was banned.

Sure, this topic unevitably wandered into the discussion of PvP in the game, but any common sensical person would realize such a discussion could never truly be "won" because it is based solely on opinion. Even the "quote" you posted from the dev is based on opinion. It is spoken by the dev, however, all-be-it it is still an opinion. I disagree with it of course, in that there are obvious conflictions in presenting BB as PvP game (most notably the lack of teams that I described previously). However, as I stated, the true "right" answer to this topic is one in which the topic question is explained. And the one that I gave (above) both explains the topic question perfectly and is undeniably true, thus I have not "lost", in fact I have won, because I have won the only tangeable arguement in this discussion (your arguement, an arguement based on nothing more than opinion, can never be "won" solely for that fact, that it is based on opinion).

You claim the discussion was not about disobeying server rules and ops, when in fact, if you had bothered to read this discussion in its entirety, was based on why he was banned.
Ultimately, your achievement is of no value (the dev said its PvP... so what? there's still going to be servers that don't condone this), but my achievement is of universal importance becaues it outlines a justifiable system in which everyone can play BB and be content and agree on.

I think the original question was in fact, If you're a zombie isn't it a part of the game to attack humans. He said he would follow the server rules, so that really isn't even part of the original question.

Your first post had nothing to do with his question, you go off about how the game is supposed to be, and have since been proven wrong, you hear the statement from the dev about this game and dismiss it as an opinion, and therefore not right, so your able to still think that you are still correct in your tiny little narrow mind.

You try to write these paragraph answers, somehow thinking they make you look smart, ignoring the fact that your statement is wrong. I read the arguement, that you have since lost, and now the more you argue your incorrect position, based on your incorrect statement, the more you look like a moron or a child who refuses to except the truth.

Obeying server rules, is no universal truth, you have professed to us nothing. A proper debate ends when your side has been proven to be factually wrong, you made a statement, the maker of the game made a statement, that proves yours to be wrong, you have nothing to debate about when you are completely wrong. You are now a complete idiot, have a nice fantasy life, since in it you must always be correct.